Increased encryption a double-edged sword for the enterprise

The US Department of Homeland Security may be complaining that encryption is interfering with their attempts to eavesdrop on criminals and terrorists -- but they're not the only ones inconvenienced.


The US Department of Homeland Security may be complaining that encryption is interfering with their attempts to eavesdrop on criminals and terrorists -- but they're not the only ones inconvenienced.

Enterprise security may also be hampered by ubiquitous encryption because it makes it harder to spot when sensitive data is leaving the company, or when malware is communicating with its command and control servers.

Cloud-based email services, online storage sites, and other cloud application providers have already begun encrypting traffic. Even social networks are encrypting traffic. And, recently, Firefox experimented with expanding encryption to more and more of the Web.

According to a recent report from Dell, the amount of encrypted traffic through corporate firewalls has doubled over the past year and now accounts for 60 percent of all communications.

But not all corporations are prepared for the day when all traffic in and out of their networks is encrypted.

Fortunately, while there isn't much the DHS and the NSA can do to stem the spread of encryption, there are steps that enterprises can take to ensure that encryption is benefiting them and not their enemies.

The latest smart firewalls can decrypt and monitor both incoming and outgoing traffic, helping companies with both data loss prevention and malware control.

Time for firewall upgrades

Ubiquitous encryption will most affect enterprises running older firewalls and data loss prevention solutions.

"If browsers start encrypting everything, it will make spotting malicious traffic harder," said Jeremy Scott, senior research analyst at Solutionary.

Security analysts need to be able to see traffic in order to see whether sensitive data is being exfiltrated or malware is being downloaded.

"By protecting the traffic from prying eyes, it also prevents detection of malicious activity by watchful eyes," said Scott.

Jeremy Scott, senior research analyst at Solutionary

Legacy systems are already effectively blind to 60 percent of all traffic, said John Gordineer, director of product marketing for network security at Dell.

"This is definitely a big issue," said John Pirc, chief strategy officer and co-founder at security vendor Bricata.

However, solutions are already on the market, in the form of web proxies and other security devices that provide a decryption method that allows the security appliance to inspect encrypted traffic.

In the past, systems that decrypted and analyzed traffic may have had a performance impact on communications, Pirc said.

"You need to buy dedicated devices that do SSL offload," he said.

Another option is cloud-based Web application firewalls, though these require that enterprises give up their SSL keys to an outside vendor.

Rogue encryption a big red flag

But a proxy can't always decrypt all traffic in and out of a company.

For example, employees using their own encryption programs, unsanctioned by the enterprise, can still encrypt documents before sending them out to cloud storage, to file sharing sites, to their personal email accounts, or to untrustworthy third parties.

And malware programs that use encryption to hide malicious traffic aren't likely to share keys with enterprise firewalls.

But even if this traffic can't be decrypted, the very existence of unsanctioned encrypted traffic is a warning sign, said Bryan Simon, SANS Certified Instructor at SANS Institute and president and CEO of Xploit Security.

"The proxy knows when it can't read the traffic," he said. "That's an indicator of a bad connection."

In addition, malware might not even know that it's supposed to go through the proxy, he added.

"If you have continuous networking monitoring in your environment, you can tell if your clients are launching legitimate SSL connections versus malware," he said.

Of course, malware writers will adapt, he added.

"The adversary will use what they can," he said. "If they can't do encryption, they'll go plain text. They don't care. They're that brazen."

Next section: Monitor traffic destinations -- and origins

"Recommended For You"

Security vendors find a common language Google denies report of Gmail security risk on Apple iOS