Email harvesters hit with £500m anti-spam lawsuit

A £500m lawsuit filed this week promises to open up a new front in the battle against spam.


A £500m lawsuit filed this week promises to open up a new front in the battle against spam.

It targets not just spammers, but - for the first time - also those responsible for harvesting e-mail addresses on behalf of spammers.

The lawsuit, filed in the US on behalf of Project Honey Pot members in over 100 countries. Project Honey Pot is a service provided by anti-spam company Unspam Technologies.

"If you've harvested email addresses or sent spam in the last two years, chances are you're on our radar screen and we're coming after you," a note posted on the Project Honey Pot website said Thursday.

"This lawsuit is unique because we believe it is the first major case in the United States to bring a claim against spammers for harvesting e-mail addresses," the note said. "While this practice has been a penalty enhancement under the CAN-SPAM Act since it was passed, in most cases the data was not available in order to prove an address was harvested."

The case is being handled by Jon Praed, a founding partner of the US-based Internet Law Group, which has represented and won anti-spam lawsuits for clients such as Verizon Online and AOL in the past.

Project Honey Pot bills itself as a system for identifying spammers and the so-called spambots used by email harvesters to scrape addresses from Web sites. Web site owners can install honey pot software on their sites that allows them to identify spam, as well as when the email was sent to was harvested by the spammer - and the IP address of the harvester.

Among the terabytes of data Project Honey Point has collected are more than 6m spam emails, 2.5m IP addresses from which spam was sent and about 15,000 IP addresses belonging to email harvesters.

The data will allow the plaintiffs to ask the court to subpoena ISPs for the identities of the owners of some of these IP addresses, Praed said.

"We are going after the largest targets. The discovery will focus on the big fish. Some of these guys have made a big mistake. They have failed to use anonymity. If you are going to commit an Internet crime everything has to be anonymous."

Often in anti-spam litigation the biggest stumbling block is establishing the identity of the spammer, Praed said. "What they are engaged in is such inappropriate behaviour they usually can't defend themselves to anyone," once they are identified.

Unlike many other anti-spam initiatives, Project Honey Pot does a good job of gathering evidence against email harvesters that will probably stand up in a court of law, said John Levine chairman of the Internet Anti-Spam Research group. "They have an enormous database where they have evidence of those who collected email addresses for spamming. Although spam comes from different places, in reality there are only a few who harvest addresses for spammers."

Going after such harvesters is a good tactic, he said. "The more expensive and risky we can make it for them the less spam" there will be.

"Recommended For You"

Big-time spammer freed as Virginia overturns spam law 12 spam research projects that might make a difference