Cisco makes the charts - now no. 3 in blades
When Cisco began shipping UCS slightly over two years ago, competitor reaction ranged the gamut from concerned to gleefully dismissive of their chances at success in the server market.
The reasons given for their guaranteed lack of success were...
When Cisco began shipping UCS slightly over two years ago, competitor reaction ranged the gamut from concerned to gleefully dismissive of their chances at success in the server market. The reasons given for their guaranteed lack of success were a combination of technical (the product won’t really work), the economics (Cisco can’t live on server margins) to cultural (Cisco doesn’t know servers and can’t succeed in a market where they are not the quasi-monopolistic dominating player). Some ignored them, and some attempted to preemptively introduce products that delivered similar functionality, and in the two years following introduction, competitive reaction was very similar - yes they are selling, but we don’t think they are a significant threat. Any lingering doubt about whether Cisco can become a credible supplier has been laid to rest with Cisco’s recent quarterly financial disclosures and IDC’s revelation that Cisco is now the No. 3 worldwide blade vendor, with slightly over 10% of worldwide (and close to 20% in North America) blade server shipments. In their quarterly call, Cisco revealed Q1 revenues of $171 million, for a $684 million revenue run rate, and claimed a booking run rate of $900 million annually. In addition, they placed their total customer count at 5,400. While actual customer count is hard to verify, Cisco has been reporting a steady and impressive growth in customers since initial shipment, and Forrester’s anecdotal data confirms both the significant interest and installed UCS systems among Forrester’s clients. So what’s next? Hard to call, but we see at a minimum a period of UCS growth at a pace that far exceeds competitors and the market as a whole. The gap between No. 3 and No. 2 is much larger than the gap between zero and Cisco’s current position, and while competitors certainly were not caught napping by this announcement, it will probably sharpen the competitive focus on Cisco from its larger rivals HP and IBM. If you're considering buying blades, this is a VERY good time to be negotiating with one of the incumbents if Cisco is in the picture.
Posted by Richard Fichera