I recently had an opportunity to spend some time with SUSE management, including President and General Manager Nils Brauckmann, and came away with what I think is a reasonably clear picture of The Attachmate Group’s (TAG) intentions and of SUSE’s overall condition these days. Overall, impressions were positive, with some key takeaways:
- TAG has clarified its intentions regarding SUSE. TAG has organised its computer holdings as four independent business units, Novell, NetIQ, Attachmate and SUSE, each one with its own independent sales, development, marketing, etc. resources. The advantages and disadvantages of this approach are pretty straightforward, with the lack of opportunity to share resources aiming the business units for R&D and marketing/sales being balanced off by crystal clear accountability and the attendant focus it brings. SUSE management agrees that it has undercommunicated in the past, and says that now that the corporate structure has been nailed down it will be very aggressive in communicating its new structure and goals.
- SUSE’s market presence has shifted to a more balanced posture. Over the last several years SUSE has shifted to a somewhat less European-centric focus, with 50% of revenues coming from North America, less than 50% from EMEA, and claims to be the No. 1 Linux vendor in China, where it has expanded its development staffing. SUSE claims to have gained market share overall, laying claim to approximately 30% of WW Linux market share by revenue.
- Focus on enterprise and cloud. Given its modest revenues of under $200 million, SUSE realises that it cannot be all things to all people, and states that it will be focusing heavily on enterprise business servers and cloud technology, with less emphasis on desktops and projects that do not have strong financial returns, such as its investment in Mono, which it has partnered with Xamarin to continue development,.
All in all a positive read on SUSE, and this session went a long way toward allaying any fears that SUSE will either disappear or lose its focus as an appendage to a larger Attachmate Group. My overall advice at this point to clients evaluating enterprise Linux choices would be to simply consider it on its merits and not spend time trying to decode any hidden intentions regarding its corporate parent.
I think its parents' intentions are now pretty clearly on display - to compete aggressively as an enterprise and cloud platform with Red Hat and anyone else who comes along. This is good news for users, since a healthy duopoly with strong competition is infinitely better than a de facto monopoly.
Posted by Richard Fichera