BMW chooses OpenStack for private cloud over commercial vendors due to lock-in risk

BMW is preparing to replace its in-house developed private cloud platform with an OpenStack system, deciding against partnering with proprietary cloud management vendors due to the risk of lock-in.

Share

BMW is preparing to replace its in-house developed private cloud platform with OpenStack open source system, deciding against proprietary cloud management vendors due to the risk of lock-in.

The car manufacturer started developing its Python-based private cloud management system in 2011, but began seeking alternatives after it found that conventional virtualisation and automation could not reap the efficiencies it required.

Speaking to ComputerworldUK at OpenStack Summit in Paris, BMW’s head of data centre infrastructure, Dr Stefan Lenz, said that deploying a cloud management platform from a commercial vendor would be easier and faster, but “my fear is that then I am too tied to the roadmap of these companies”. 

“The problem really is that this [technology] is not yet settled, this is not a stable thing from the point of view of what the software should do. For example, you know what an Excel spreadsheet is supposed to do - it is a very defined task, and it is very mature. OpenStack is still not clearly defined at its borders - such as how storage and networking is handled, and the whole market is still flowing - not only OpenStack. 

“If I now choose a commercial vendor I am tied to their roadmap and I need to give them money to buy the software. That money is then an investment that ties me to their roadmap, and I think it is too early to do this. With OpenStack I feel I have more openness, and don’t have to throw it all away and maybe lose the money invested.”

Re-assessing internal private cloud

BMW has four data centres globally, with 98 percent of its servers managed from a Munich operations centre. It runs around 12,000 operating system images, half Linux and half Microsoft, with around 80 percent of its infrastructure virtualised and ‘cloud-ready’.

Three years ago the firm went down a path of “brutal standardisation”, developing a management and orchestration layer to bring all of its automation under one modular framework.

“It was wonderful, it was perfect - we got new efficiencies and everything was great. And then we ran into trouble,” said Lenz. BMW ran into problems running certain applications, for example.

After consulting with staff, Lenz ran a trial of the OpenStack Icehouse release on a single server, before growing this to what he terms a ‘pre-production’ environment, with 16TB of storage and 100 cores.

“We see in OpenStack two major advantages. First we have an API in the data model to describe cloud and virtual instances that will become industry standard. So when anyone develops on that, it will be stable - we do not have to change whole tool chains. That is a big advantage and an area where we failed because we were unable with our internal cloud development to get that stable input.

“The second thing we see is that it is open source and free. No one earns money on the growth of our company, no one comes with unexpected license fees after we have develop a lot of software around it. And we have experienced that a lot. So that is the reason that we believe OpenStack is the right choice at the core of our automation.”

'Prime candidate' for private cloud

OpenStack is now the “prime candidate” to resolve its orchestration layer difficulties, and he believes that a substantial amount of its applications could be running on OpenStack within three years - provided it meets certain criteria such as delivering anticipated cost benefits.

“We will start step by step, and if we find any obstacle, we always keep our conventional [cloud platform] in parallel, so we can move back and forth,” he said.

“We have not made a cost-based decision right now, but if this does not help us to bring cost down by another 10-15 percent - at least - then it is dead.”

One use case could be to improve delivery of resources to develop dev-test teams working on connected car systems, he explained.

“We have a lot of people in the engineering department who do development and testing of software for connected cars, and we have a lot of people who develop on backend systems for all of these things. These people have already asked if they can get on that environment. 

“We run about 3,000 applications and we have a lot of people who will be interested to get the test and development instances. So I can imagine that about a third of the 12,000 [operating system] instances go for development and testing.

"That is the potential, if we could put every dev and test on an OpenStack environment there is potential for maybe 4,000 server instances.” 

However, he said that, like all large manufacturing firms, BMW has extremely time-critical systems, which means that around 20 percent of its workloads will remain in a conventional operations mode, and “maybe even on physical servers”. 

Find your next job with computerworld UK jobs