RSS FeedWhite Papers

White Paper Download

Manifesting Your Best—Entrusting to Experts the Rest

Solving the needs of application software companies

Category: Application Services

Date: , 17:30

In order to optimize business functionality, maximize profit, and grow the business, companies must know when to focus appropriate internal resources on critical business functions, and when to otherwise entrust these functions to external experts. A first hurdle for some companies is that they do not recognize a need for improvement, or worse yet, recognize the need but avoid reparative action for fear of losing control of guarded intellectual capital and business processes that they’ve perceived as proprietary.

As a result, they remain bound by the inertia of their own perfunctory performance, and their business suffers. Companies must be able to differentiate their core competencies from their subordinate capabilities, and know when it is advantageous to outsource critical integral design, development, and delivery requirements that they cannot effectively meet within their own sphere of capability.

Manifesting Your Best Entrusting to Experts the Rest"       When Partnering with Software Engineering Experts May Be Imperative to Your Success  Untitled Document Manifesting Your Best Entrusting to Experts The Rest  Cyber Group, Inc. White Paper 2 of 9 If selling and delivering application software as a product or service comprises your company s business, but you want to focus your resources in other areas of your core business or software engineering is not one of your company s necessary core competencies, then you have a strong argument for partnering with a technology expert whose core competency is application software engineering. This wand services depend heavily or entirely on software that they may not be equipped or qualified to optimally engineer. Such a condition within any company typically results in misallocated rwim   li   l  inf  ri  r   rnrvilr n  v  rinm  rand ultimately, business stagnation or decline.  By weighing the advantages and disadvantages of partnering with technology experts as a means of satisfying software engineering needs, and by providing a criteria for self-assessment with common-sense guidelines, this paper intends to help application software companies determine whether partnering is the rational and perhaps only viable choice for them. The Dilemma n   r    rimizinf  n   i  n  lim  ximizr  finr  w    hinm    nimkn  w   wh  nfr    riin   rn  l rrn   ri i   linf  n   i  nnwhen to otherwise entrust these functi  nx   rn  l   x    r   . Air    h  r  l   f  rmm    nii    hhnrnizf  r  im  r  v  m  nr  w  rrnizh    nv  i    rr   ivi  n  f  r  f    r    f  l    inn r  l    frintellectual capital and business processes hh     vr   ivr    rir  .  Arlhr  m  innh   in  r iftheir own perfunctory performance, and their business suffers.  m    nimliff  r  n ih  irrmn  ifrom   their   subordinate   capabilities,   and   kn  w   wh  n   i    iv  nrri i   l inr  li  nv  l    m  nnliv  r    rir  m  nhhnnffiv  l    mwithin their own sphere of capability.  According to Hamel and Prahalad in their book, minrthe Future, rmn  irhili ihrri i   linhi  vinmi ivv  nnrdefined as capabilities that a firm can do well and that:  - Provide customer benefits - Are difficult for competitors to imitate - Can be leveraged widely to many products and markets.  All other capabilities are essentially categorized as subordinate.    &managers will be judged on their ability to identify, cultivate, and exploit the core competencies that make growth possible indeed, they'll have to rethink the concept of the corporation it self.  Prahalad and Hamel 1990Untitled Document Manifesting Your Best Entrusting to Experts The Rest  Cyber Group, Inc. White Paper 3 of 9                 hilh  r    i    inh  r  n l    n   hin    wr  n    wi h  h  vinrnr  inili ir    l  mmvi    nf  rcompanies     when     they     co  fhili innn li h  r  mi    llh  ir    r  fi  n  lr  f  ilniz   wh  n  him  l   l   kffi  i  n  rrrl in   ini h  rin inf  ri  r   rrrvinlh  r mi   intheir business marks.  As ai  i  n  m  k  r  whi  i  nirm    nsuccess or failure, you might need to consider these questions:  hi  hrl  m  nrinll   hrri i    lhi  vinnv  nover your competitors?  What does your conr  vihnv  rwi    lm  nrn   m  rkbut is difficult for competitors to imitate?  nrll    rlfinhl  m  nfrinr n  xirmin   if  hr   nfrinternal rerhi    fn   m  nifinrrmn  iirrlrr i  nnwh   h  rhm  inin    rrlli  n  illr  vi  inifi    leturn on    our investment. You ma   be    ettin   somethin   for your money, but how much, and at what cost?  Saying It Does Not Make It So  m    niwi hli  hf w  rn  in    rinr m  nf   n   h  vmiffi    lin   rnizinhr    m   f  rm  r  v  m  n    xiwi hin   hr m  nwhi  h i   wh    hnever consider a possible n r  lin    i  h r   ininn   i  nx   rn  lr i    . A  ifr  m   rhinh   fin  n  i  lifii  n  f  rr n  rin    wi h    n    x   rn  lhn  lx    rhich should actuall   be the drivin   motivation for an   such determination, the emotionahm  n    hm  nhn  lnr    h  v    f  r   h  irr m  nnimm  nhthey fail recognize intrinsic opportunity in alternative solutions. ...companies that confuse their capabilities& consequently either misallocate their professionals or fail to recognize when they simply lack sufficient resources, resulting in either case in inferior product or services, and altogether missing their Untitled Document Manifesting Your Best Entrusting to Experts The Rest  Cyber Group, Inc. White Paper 4 of 9 nr   h  vl    i imrnn   rnnpotential negative impahr n  rin    mi  h   h  vn   h  irrr  fi  n  l  .   In    r   h    h  w  v  rr  finh  irexisting core professionals to true rmn  ih  irff  rnlin  w win  rm  rn  figain competitive advantage, and    v  rhrr  nrnn  w    rn    n  w  m  rkr   ni ill    f  whi  hnrivlnm  rkh  r.   M  r    v  rn rinrr  inili ix    rwhprimary competencies are these very capabilities, you incryour   products   quality   in     rhmh  vr  vilsuffered.  llin    rrm  ximizrmn  ih    lnot be confused with the wrong-thinking panacea that continues to   ripple   over   corporate   America,   purporting   that   to   s  vm    nifr  m   li    in    inhf  lm  rkh  rhmrlrwi h  nn  i    r   i  n   hinhrrivi    .nilrf   Imm  rwriinnlwhir    Prr  m  nOutsourcing, that r  inn    rili ill  wcompanies   with   limited   resources   to   focus   their   existing m  lnrmn  iwhi  hnin  rrivih  mnfflr  nhw  r   lexternal vendors.  Another serious con  i    r   i  n  ihinr    rillln   rn  l  rrnf  r  l  w  rrnrviliwhi  hn  h  vm    inn    linffn   nm    n  .L  wlirnrvil  mi  hcompany s reputation and drive potent   linl   wh  rhm    n   m  r  fnhif   m  rwhat can t     n   r   h  r  h  nwhnn  . Thlthat m  rn  wm  r   h  n irinan existing one takes on fresh perspective.  What Exactly is Application Software Engineering?  lii  nf w  rrrfmrsoftware, whether delivered as a product, system, or on-    m  nrvim  lhili ifmrmspecific tasks or work acti  i ihin  ivilnrrf  rmrf   h  irrn  i  ili i    .  Brn   rfirlnf   n   wi hlii  nf w  rhiate  or     of   software   is   continuousl     bein      tested   in   the market,     which     generates     constant     flux,     d  m  nf  rimprovement, and a consequent need for rapid modification.  lii  nf w  rn  in    rinh  n    ifinhi   i  linfi  ninrinn    m  in   ininlii  nf w  rl  inhn  l    inrifr  mmrsci  nrm  nm  nn  in    rinnlii  ndomains.  If this sounds complex, it is, which is precisely why these Outsourcing     secondary capabilities allows companies    with    limited resources   to   focus   their existing employees on core competencies, which tends to increase productivity at home   and   offset   labor needs that were lost to external vendors. Jason GilroyICG CommerceUntitled Document Manifesting Your Best Entrusting to Experts The Rest  Cyber Group, Inc. White Paper 5 of 9                 ENGINEERING COSTS... 30% 70% Design Maintenance Development     Enhancement  Re-engineering Migration  Testing  Deployment  Training  Documentation n   i  nn    rir  m  nh    l    nim  l  m  nrentrusted to, the inexperienced.  It is important to understand hfini i  nhi   h  lrrmin   wh   h  r   r  nrm    nf  llm  l  m  nif w  rn  in    rinr i    l  rlifhn   i  n  lifrrlii  nrrrvicritically depend on the application so  w  rrr  n l    rsell, and deliver.   h   fl mikmf w  rv  l    m  n   m  nr   m  khnf   l  nninri    hhflmn ir  lni  n    nv  l    m  nhx    nf   h    r  m  inincritical elements on  in    rinhf w  r  .  In   hrfn  in    rinf w  rrfr  mni  nm  rknniwili  hhfi  ninnv  l    inhf w  rl  ni   lln    mnlf   hlengineering cost. The remaining 70% of the cost is attributed to:  -    Maintenance -    Enhancement -    Re-engineering -    Migration -    Testing -    Deployment -    Training and documentation   rl    f  hii    rr i  nfrin    hl  nninnimplementation stages of the project, the product or s  rvihin    nn   hif w  r    ir  izi h  r  n  v  r  m  kin    im  rkr  w  rm  kin    i    h  rbroken.  Although it is difficult to pinpoint precise statistics of failure rates of projects in general since this is not the sort of information most companies are want to make public general consensus Untitled Document Manifesting Your Best Entrusting to Experts The Rest  Cyber Group, Inc. White Paper 6 of 9  When written in Chinese, the word risk is composed of two characters; one represents danger, and the other represents opportunity. John F. KennedyThe Standish Group published a survey revealing that a staggering 31.1% of software development projects will be canceled before they ever get completed, and that 52.7% of projects will cost 189% of their original estimates... puts the rate for software development project  f  il  rw    nn   7    . An   h  r wf l    kinhi   i    hn   v  rm    niwhiniv  l    inn   m  rk   inf w  rface a one-in-r    h  nff  llrin  inh  ir  n  wproducts to market. In great part, this failure is a  result of the non-core do-it-yourself r    i  m   hr  m  inr  v  l  n   in   htechnology-based industry.  hn  i  hrli  hrvr  v    linhrin1.1ff w  rv  l    m  nrwillcanceled before they ever get completnh2.7frwill1f   h  ir    ri  in  lim.  Whilhi   irv  r  flinv  n    n    nimi   i   nhimargin for loss should be unacceptable for any company.  For   companies   whose   core   competencies   are   not f w  rn  in    rinwhn inn  in    r    h  irf w  rh  m   lvh    lnx    n  n i  l.n  i    rinhkm    niim  lnnff  rm  l    h  ir v  llbut limited resources against such extreme odds.  To Partner or Not to Partner That is the Question  nnh  ll   f  rinifnr    i  m   hif    hnr n  rinh  r    mxihn i  l  f  rin.Justification for partnering with a technology expert includes:  -    The principal company has a need f  rm  r  h  n  ivflife-cycle software engineering services. - hm    n    hrminhf w  rn  in    rin    irmnhh   nf w  rlcritical role in the company s primary products or services. -    The compan   rnizhr  m  in vi    l    i  mfinternal resources on core competencies.        lr  n  linnl  nr   nin  r  llresu    oses some sort of risk. Transitionin   an assumed core competency to a new business partner mar   nm   ri  kn  l    inhnim   nrinh   n  wr n  rn   hrnrivw  llhlf  r   hrvir  n    r    .  Thm  inhowever, pale when considering the untold losses  in    rrr  nni  l  in  ffi  i  nrrlinnnfm  r  .  Kin  minhninnr n  r    whx    r inrmn  ir  vihrnm  li  hrwnivactua lr    mlinr    wnf w  rrnl imlsave money. Untitled Document Manifesting Your Best Entrusting to Experts The Rest  Cyber Group, Inc. White Paper 7 of 9 ...in an equitable partnership, you always maintain possession of your domain knowledge, which ensures you continual control of your business... There are many notable advantages to pa   n  rin    wi hf w  rengineering experts:  - winimr   m  nnn in    llr  ininremployees on ever-  v  lvinhn  l    ihrih  irexpertise and scope of responsibilities. -    Delegating the headache of continued research to world-  lexperts whose business it is to have instant access to up-to-intellectual capital. - ininmnr n  r   whr  vih   h  m  n   x    r inn    lrni  klm  rkh  nwith scalable, flexible solutions. -    Leveraging    best-of-  rl  nnr  v  nrlpractices. -    Radically reducing your costs associated with life-lf w  rengineering for products and services. -     n    rinvrrl    hn inlsupports both existing systems and new initiatives. - inimizin   li   l   n   m  ximizin   in   rn  l   r    niz   i  nlinrm  nm  n   rn  i  iliiwi hyour software engineering needs.  nr  firm  hrminhr  inrf w  rengineering neei   im    r   iviivnrmin    whi  hlifii  nhx   rn  l   v  n    r   mpossess before you can relinquish critical operations with assurance.        The keystone to making the bridge with your chosen partner is thahr n  r   h    llr    i  lm   n  w ini i   ivhi    lh  n  whw    lh  rwimnimplement these initiatives yourself.  A software engineering partner should be:  -    retainable on a project-by-project basis, - lmnr i    l  r    hfrlrinprocess, - irn   n ir   liflff w  rrfrom cradle to grave.  in minh    in   nilr n  r  hilwm  in   inpossession of your domain knowwhi  h   n    rn in    lontrol of   our business. Your   artner should never need to own or n r  lrm  in kn  wlin   r    rm  nifr kn  wlnvi  i  n i . Thir    fr    m  n    n    rh   fl  xi  iliyou need to grow rinwi hmmi  inr  limii   l rrnliv    .h    lnUntitled Document Manifesting Your Best Entrusting to Experts The Rest  Cyber Group, Inc. White Paper 8 of 9 Conclusion  Application software and services companies whose core competencies do not include application software engineering can benefit immensely by partnering with experts whose core competencies are application software   engineering.   Misallocated   resources   resulting   in   inferior product and services is one of the primary challenges facing American business today, and in an extremely competitive and volatile market, companies cannot afford to allocate their lifeblood to speculation and chance endeavors.  Application software companies that are serious about growing and succeeding in this diverse and competitive market should incorporate the following maxim into their mission statement:   We do what we do well, and let other experts do well for us the rest.     Untitled Document Manifesting Your Best Entrusting to Experts The Rest  Cyber Group, Inc. White Paper 9 of 9                   Authors  Tamim Shipchandler is a Senior Vice President    rr    rin D  llT  x    .  Mr.hi    h  n  l  r  i    rn  i  l    f  rr   i  n    in   h.  .    n    f  r    llriiri  nenterprise wide, including the wholly-owned subsidiary in India.  Basant Singhatwadia is Managing Director for Cyber Group s wholly-  wnn  in    rinntechnology development subsidiary based in Noida, India.                   About Cyber Group  Cyber Group, Inc. partners with their customers to engineer their control electronics products, and to maintain, re-engineer and enhance their customers software products. Their proven process significantly reduces their customers time and cost to market. It offers their customers a comprehensive, tightly coupled set of life-cycle software and system engineering services, i.e. services to engineer their control electronics and to maintain, re-engineer, support and enhance their software products and systems through all phases of their product life-cycles. Coupling of the resources in Delhi with those in Dallas enables Cyber Group to deliver faster overall solutions due to a virtual 24-hour day . Additional information can be found at www.cybergroupusa.com; or by calling 469-916-7730

You must have an account to access this white paper. Please register below. If you already have an account, please login.

Already registered?

Login

Forgot password?

New customer?

White paper download

ComputerworldUK Webcast

ComputerworldUK
Share
x
Open
* *