Skip to content


January 12, 2009

Two Google searches 'produce same CO2 as boiling kettle'

Searching 'harms the environment' says US academic

By Carrie-Ann Skinner


Using Google to conduct two web searches produces the same amount of carbon emissions as boiling a kettle, says a US physicist.

Resarch by Alex Wissner-Gross, who is also a Harvard University academic, revealed that using a PC to conduct one Google search generates 7g of carbon dioxide and two searches is equal to the 14g of carbon dioxide produced when boiling a kettle with enough water for one cup of tea. With two million internet searches taking place every day, the carbon emissions are beginning to mount up.

Gross says the carbon emissions are from the electricity used by the PC and from the several Google data banks across the globe that provide the answers to a search query. Gross adds that because Google uses several data banks for each query, it's generating more carbon dioxide than other search engines.

However, Google has rubbished these claims. The search engine says it has "the most energy efficient datacentres in the world" and the carbon dixoide figure is "many times" too high.

"Queries vary in degree of difficulty, but for the average query, the servers it touches each work on it for just a few thousandths of a second. Together with other work performed before your search even starts (such as building the search index) this amounts to 0.0003 kWh of energy per search or 1 kJ," the company claims in a blog.

"In terms of greenhouse gases, one Google search is equivalent to about 0.2 grams of CO2," Google said.

The researchers claim that Google's search engine generates high levels of CO2 because of the way it operates. When you type in a Google search the request doesn’t go to just one server. It goes to several competing against each other.

According to industry analysts Gartner, the global IT industry generates as much greenhouse gas as the world’s airlines - about two percent of global CO2 emissions.

Follow highlights from ComputerworldUK on Twitter
Sign up for our Daily Newsletter
The UK IT News widget Get it for your site!

« prev article | more vendor watch news | next article »

Advert

close

Email this article to a friend or colleague:




PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.

close
  • This article is now being printed.
close

What are your views on this subject? Use the form below to post a comment on this article up to 1000 characters.


Characters remaining:

close

Click below to add 'Two Google searches 'produce same CO2 as boiling kettle' - Vendor watch - ComputerworldUK' to your blog.



If you do not have a ComputerworldUK Account and would like to use this feature, please Register.

If you are a registered, logged-in user, this will post the title and first paragraph of this story to your blog to share with your readers.

What is this?

Advert

WHITE PAPERS

  • Legal risks: Employee use of the internet and email
    Exploring the challenges facing IT Mangers today and vital steps to ensure safe internet an email use by employees.
  • Phishing for victims
    This White Paper examines the phenomenon of phishing. It explains the potentially catastrophic threat it presents to all kinds of organisation. Exploding some widespread myths, it lights up the murky waters where phishing first emerged and where it continues to evolve. But it also highlights what your business can do to blunt the threat.
  • Challenges and opportunities of PCI
    The control framework implicit in the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) provides an enterprise structure for improving operational, security, and audit performance.
  • Social CRM comes of age
    Who is this “social customer”? What strategies and tools does the new breed of CRM provide to do something about this?
  • Risk Management: Protect and Maximize Stakeholder Value
    What has held organisations back from a broader adoption of risk management programs?
*