Skip to content


July 09, 2007

Novell promises protection to Linux users worried by Microsoft’s GPLv3 stand

Arguments continue though no Suse software is yet licensed under GPLv3

By John Fontana


Novell will continue to ship the complete version of its Linux enterprise server even though Microsoft is attempting to distance itself legally from the new General Public License (GPL) v3 open source license.

Advert

Novell also assured customers that they would continue to be protected from Microsoft patent claims regarding any open source software, including components licensed under the open source GPLv3 license.

Novell said Friday on its public relations blog that it would "continue to distribute SUSE Linux Enterprise Server with its full set of functionality and features, including those components that are licensed under GPLv3."

Currently, there is no software licensed under the GPLv3 in the SUSE Linux Enterprise Server (SLES).

"But we expect that there will be various packages included in SLES in the future that will be licensed under GPLv3," said Bruce Lowery, director of global public relations for Novell. SLES is licensed under a Novell End User License Agreement (EULA), which state that components of the software may be accompanied by other license terms, such as GPLv2.

On July 5, Microsoft issued a statement saying it had no legal obligation under GPLv3 and was not a contracting party to the open source license that was released June 29.

The software giant also said that coupons it has issued for Novell SUSE Linux support will not be honored for any code licensed under GPLv3, which includes language to prevent the type of patent deals Microsoft has signed with Linux vendors Novell, Xandros and Linspire.

Microsoft said in its statement, "While there have been some claims that Microsoft's distribution of certificates for Novell support services, under our interoperability collaboration with Novell, constitutes acceptance of the GPLv3 license, we do not believe that such claims have a valid legal basis under contract, intellectual property, or any other law."

Microsoft and Novell in November 2006 entered into a business and technology partnership that included an agreement not to assert patent and intellectual property rights against each others customers. The agreement runs through 2012.

Microsoft went on to say in its statement, "Microsoft has decided that the Novell support certificates that we distribute to customers will not entitle the recipient to receive from Novell, or any other party, any subscription for support and updates relating to any code licensed under GPLv3. We will closely study the situation and decide whether to expand the scope of the certificates in the future."

The statement also said, "We do not believe that Microsoft needs a license under GPL to carry out any aspect of its collaboration with Novell, including its distribution of support certificates, even if Novell chooses to distribute GPLv3 code in the future."

But to avoid any debate, Microsoft said it was putting restrictions on the Novell support coupons it has issued, which were distributed without an expiration date.

Novell's Lowry said users who obtain their Linux via a certificate from Microsoft will get a regular SUSE Linux Enterprise Server subscription, regardless of the terms of the certificate provided by Microsoft. Users who have already received SUSE Linux Enterprise certificates from Microsoft are not affected, he said.

Follow highlights from ComputerworldUK on Twitter
Sign up for our Daily Newsletter
The UK IT News widget Get it for your site!

« prev article | more operating systems news | next article »

Advert

close

Email this article to a friend or colleague:




PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.

close
  • This article is now being printed.
close

What are your views on this subject? Use the form below to post a comment on this article up to 1000 characters.


Characters remaining:

close

Click below to add 'Novell promises protection to Linux users worried by Microsoft’s GPLv3 stand - Linux & Unix - ComputerworldUK' to your blog.



If you do not have a ComputerworldUK Account and would like to use this feature, please Register.

If you are a registered, logged-in user, this will post the title and first paragraph of this story to your blog to share with your readers.

What is this?

Comments received

nanotech said on Tuesday, 10 July 2007

I think MS needs Novell more than Novell needs MS, I see a "divorce" in the near future. The deal with MS espewing the verbal sewage of patent 235 infringements, if they know there are 235 which ones are they; they will be fixed and MS will lose the cross license stream. MS take your permatemps (slave labor) to Vancouver and good riddence. The EU and Asia unlike the US governments can't be bought and I hope they turn up the heat. I started with MS years ago and now regret every day of it as I was one who blindly empowered them

Advert

WHITE PAPERS

  • Legal risks: Employee use of the internet and email
    Exploring the challenges facing IT Mangers today and vital steps to ensure safe internet an email use by employees.
  • Phishing for victims
    This White Paper examines the phenomenon of phishing. It explains the potentially catastrophic threat it presents to all kinds of organisation. Exploding some widespread myths, it lights up the murky waters where phishing first emerged and where it continues to evolve. But it also highlights what your business can do to blunt the threat.
  • Challenges and opportunities of PCI
    The control framework implicit in the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) provides an enterprise structure for improving operational, security, and audit performance.
  • Social CRM comes of age
    Who is this “social customer”? What strategies and tools does the new breed of CRM provide to do something about this?
  • Risk Management: Protect and Maximize Stakeholder Value
    What has held organisations back from a broader adoption of risk management programs?
*