Management
Technology
- Applications
- Business Intelligence
- Development
- Hardware
- Mobile & Wireless
- Networking
- Internet
- Operating Systems
- Security Products
- Servers & Datacentre
- Storage
Toolbox
Training
Books
White Papers
Webcast
Resource Centre
May 08, 2007
JavaOne: Open source is Robin Hood in reverse says Sun
Time to pay open source coders for the value they create exec states
By Paul Krill
Sun is proposing that open-source developers be paid for the revenue-generating technology that they have made available for free.
Advert
At the CommunityOne and NetBeansDay events in San Francisco on Monday, Rich Green, Sun executive vice president for software, expressed doubts about the current model in which open-source developers create free intellectual property and have others scoop it up to generate huge amounts of revenue.
"It really is a worrisome social artifact," Green said. "I think in the long term that this is a worrisome scenario [and] not sustainable. We are looking very closely at compensating people for the work that they do."
The current scenario is Robin Hood backwards: stealing from the poor and making others rich, said Green. He stressed that Sun, however, is the number-one contributor to open source worldwide.
There is a need to work closely with those in the open-source community to share revenues, said Green.
"I'm sure we're going to do that," Green said, without providing specific details on how this would be done.
A CommunityOne attendee, Steve Bilan, an independent software engineer, said he would not be motivated to develop an open-source project just because there was money on the table.
"I would only do [a project] if I was interested," in it, said Bilan, who described himself as somewhat of an open-source developer.
Meanwhile, author Tim O'Reilly said at CommunityOne that the days in which developer salaries differ based on the nation where the developer is located were numbered. Developers overseas now are asking why they should get paid less than others, he said.
"We're actually coming to the end of cheap outsourcing," O'Reilly said.
Follow highlights from ComputerworldUK on Twitter
Sign up for our Daily Newsletter
The UK IT News widget Get it for your site!
« prev article | more development news | next article »
Advert
Email this article to a friend or colleague:
PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.
- This article is now being printed.
What are your views on this subject? Use the form below to post a comment on this article up to 1000 characters.
Click below to add 'JavaOne: Open source is Robin Hood in reverse says Sun - Software Development - ComputerworldUK' to your blog.
If you do not have a ComputerworldUK Account and would like to use this feature, please Register.
If you are a registered, logged-in user, this will post the title and first paragraph of this story to your blog to share with your readers.
Advert
Newsletters
Our Daily & Weekly Newsletters highlight breaking news, vital issues, expert analysis and solutions to help you stay ahead of developments in the industry.
WHITE PAPERS
-
Legal risks: Employee use of the internet and email
Exploring the challenges facing IT Mangers today and vital steps to ensure safe internet an email use by employees. -
Phishing for victims
This White Paper examines the phenomenon of phishing. It explains the potentially catastrophic threat it presents to all kinds of organisation. Exploding some widespread myths, it lights up the murky waters where phishing first emerged and where it continues to evolve. But it also highlights what your business can do to blunt the threat.
Comments received
harry said on Tuesday, 08 May 2007
So what do they want, closed source, who wrote this, the sheriff of knottingham?
Steve Smith said on Tuesday, 08 May 2007
Did you read this? I think it is good news for open source developers. We work on what we want. They pay us for the vlaue we create for their business (except we won't ever get hte full value of our work...)