Skip to content


May 15, 2008

Oracle customers slow to adopt new database

Sign of a mature technology?

By Jon Brodkin


Few Oracle customers are using the latest database software unveiled launched last July, according to an analysis of the Pythian Group's remote database support customers.

Advert

Oracle has claimed "strong adoption" of Database 11g, but declined to release specific adoption numbers after being presented with statistics compiled by the Pythian Group, which manages 718 production databases for 56 Oracle customers.

Only three of those 718 databases, representing two out of the 56 customers, are running the latest Oracle software, according to Pythian CEO Paul Vallee. While Oracle promised hundreds of new features in 11g, including space savings and more efficient patching, it turns out that most customers are satisfied by the previous version, 10g, which began shipping in February 2004, Vallee says.

"What's happening in a meaningful sense is the database is feature-complete and maybe it has been for a while," he said.

Oracle's launch event last July featured James Burke, a science historian, author and BBC television host, who predicted 11g will "free up the massive potential of the brainpower in companies." Oracle named four organizations using 11g in a press release last month, but didn't say how many companies are using the software overall.

If adoption is slow, it's bound to pick up soon, according to figures provided by the Independent Oracle Users Group (IOUG).
http://www.ioug.org/

"An IOUG membership survey conducted last year revealed that 35% said they'd upgrade to 11g within a year, and 53% said within the next year," IOUG president Ari Kaplan said.

“The number of people planning to upgrade within 12 to 18 months was higher than any previous release we surveyed over the years. First adopters will be those that have a pressing business need. Typically what I see is it's usually 18 months before you hit 33% adoption."

IDC analyst Carl Olofson said his sources at Oracle told him that 10% of users expressed intent to upgrade to 11g this year. If all follow through on their intent to upgrade, that would be an unusually high adoption rate for the first year, he added.

But Olofson noted that sources within Oracle tend to be optimistic.

Vallee, meanwhile, claims his numbers show 11g is being adopted at slower rates than previous Oracle databases.

Oracle licenses allow customers to adopt any supported version of the company's database, so low adoption alone won't hurt Oracle financially, Vallee says. But Oracle can lower its own expenses by consolidating customers onto fewer versions, because it costs money to have developers and support staff working on old platforms. "The more their customers have adopted multiple platforms, the more painful it is to support those customers," he says.

11g became available on available on Linux last August and on Windows last October. The three 11g databases in production and managed by Pythian are all on Linux. While two out of 56 Pythian customers are using 11g in production, another four have tested the database but not yet put it into production.

Citing his experience in statistical modeling, Vallee says he can say with 95% confidence that no more than 3.66% of Oracle databases are running 11g. With 50% confidence, he says it's unlikely that even 1% use 11g.

The accuracy of those numbers depends on whether the 718 databases managed by Pythian represent an accurate cross-section of Oracle customers. Vallee believes it's a robust sample."

The Pythian Group is based in Ottawa, Ontario, and has offices in the United States, Europe, India and Australia.

Oracle declined to comment about Vallee's findings. In the transcript of a February earnings call, Oracle President Charles Phillips says the various editions of Oracle's database, including older versions, have 12,000 customers. Phillips said 11g is "off to a good start" with more than 200,000 downloads, but didn't say how many customers are using it in production. Oracle offers a free evaluation download.

Follow highlights from ComputerworldUK on Twitter
Sign up for our Daily Newsletter
The UK IT News widget Get it for your site!

« prev article | more business intelligence news | next article »

Advert

close

Email this article to a friend or colleague:




PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.

close
  • This article is now being printed.
close

What are your views on this subject? Use the form below to post a comment on this article up to 1000 characters.


Characters remaining:

close

Click below to add 'Oracle customers slow to adopt new database - Databases - ComputerworldUK' to your blog.



If you do not have a ComputerworldUK Account and would like to use this feature, please Register.

If you are a registered, logged-in user, this will post the title and first paragraph of this story to your blog to share with your readers.

What is this?

Advert

WHITE PAPERS

  • Legal risks: Employee use of the internet and email
    Exploring the challenges facing IT Mangers today and vital steps to ensure safe internet an email use by employees.
  • Phishing for victims
    This White Paper examines the phenomenon of phishing. It explains the potentially catastrophic threat it presents to all kinds of organisation. Exploding some widespread myths, it lights up the murky waters where phishing first emerged and where it continues to evolve. But it also highlights what your business can do to blunt the threat.
  • Challenges and opportunities of PCI
    The control framework implicit in the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) provides an enterprise structure for improving operational, security, and audit performance.
  • Social CRM comes of age
    Who is this “social customer”? What strategies and tools does the new breed of CRM provide to do something about this?
  • Risk Management: Protect and Maximize Stakeholder Value
    What has held organisations back from a broader adoption of risk management programs?
*