Open source 'wasn't available' two years ago, says Universal Credit chief

Open source 'wasn't available' two years ago, says Universal Credit chief

Howard Shiplee said that the welfare project will now be using open source and web-based tech

Article comments

The head of delivery for the Department for Work and Pensions’ (DWP) flagship welfare reform project, Universal Credit, has said that the department didn’t adopt open source and web-based technologies at the beginning of the project because “such things weren’t available” two and a half years ago.

Howard Shiplee told the Work and Pensions Committee this week that the department is now using open source technologies in its enhanced version of Universal Credit, which was initially developed by the Government Digital Service (GDS) and will be rolled out nationally by 2017 for most claimants.

The existing system being used in pathfinder pilots and developed by the likes of IBM, HP and Accenture will be largely be replaced by the digital version.

“The current system for Universal Credit is a conventional system being developed on a waterfall approach. When you look at digital [the enhanced system], it’s very different – it relies not on large amounts of tin, black boxes, but uses open source and mechanisms on the web to store and access data,” Shiplee told MPs.

When asked why he didn’t adopt this approach two and a half years ago at the start of the project, Shiplee said: “Technology is moving very rapidly, such things weren’t available as they are today.”

Universal Credit aims to merge benefits such as jobseeker’s allowance, income support, housing benefit, child tax credit and working credit. The IT system supporting it will require real-time data on the earnings of every adult, from a new Pay as You Earn (PAYE) system being developed by HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC).

DWP plans to spend £2.4 billion to implement Universal Credit up to April 2023 and has spent £425 million up to April 2013. Most spending so far (£303 million) has been on contracts for designing and developing IT systems. However, to date there have been a number of suspected problems with delivery.

Writing down IT assets over five years

Work and pensions secretary of state Iain Duncan Smith told the committee that he is in control of the project and that there is “no debacle”. However, he admitted that the department has had to write off, or ‘impair’, £40.1 million worth of IT assets to date – nearly a fifth more than the £34 million figure revealed to the National Audit Office earlier this year.

Moreover, this figure could increase: "If anything goes wrong going forward, that [figure] might be different," said Duncan Smith.

Mike Driver, finance director general at DWP, said that Universal Credit consists of £152 million worth of intangible assets, with £34 million of this to be used as software code in the final digital version.

Driver said that the remaining IT assets will now be written off over a five-year period, as opposed to the 15-year period that the department had originally planned. He said that the 15-year period “was too long” and he was talking to the National Audit Office (NAO) about how DWP could apply accounting practices going forward.

Taxpayer, not the IT supplier, carries the risk

When Shiplee was asked by MPs why penalty clauses had not been included in the contracts, to impose fines on the suppliers if they failed to deliver on targets, he said: “You would find it very hard to find vendors in the market place to do this work at full risk. So the department took up the risk.”

The DWP also took most of the blame for write-offs and writing down of assets, Shiplee said. The code that had been produced was of good quality, he said, but it didn’t reflect the needs of the project anymore because the specifications had changed so much.

“This software isn’t something that gets done on the back of a cigarette packet, it’s very complicated," said Shiplee.

However, DWP is now looking at how the suppliers can take some of the risk.

“There’s no perfect contract – [but] we are doing some early work, while we agree what we want them [the suppliers] to do, on getting a fixed price or target cost arrangement, which will put a reasonable amount of risk on the suppliers,” said Shiplee.

He said that this will be happening early in the New Year.

Universal Credit is not digital by default

Shiplee also told the committee that although the digital by default “mantra” was adopted as an approach at the beginning of the Universal Credit project, this “went away a long time ago”.

He believes it would be “inappropriate” to use this approach and that it would “take some time to get totally online”.

“There’s nothing wrong with having an aspiration, but perhaps it was an aspiration too far at the time," he said. 

According to Duncan Smith and Shiplee, a totally online and digital approach failed because of the security implications. They told the committee that Universal Credit needed to replicate practices in the banking industry, where when details needed to be verified, people have to go and present themselves in a branch.

However, MPs were told that the second generation Universal Credit system was being built for smartphones, as the pathfinder revealed that this is how people were mostly interacting with the service.

DWP is also planning, it was revealed, to move couples onto Universal Credit in the New Year, with children and families joining the new system in the autumn. At present Universal Credit can only handle the simplest of claims from single applicants.

MPs cited that the Office of Budget Responsibility had initially expected 4.5 million people to be on Universal Credit by March 2015, but this has now been down-graded to 400,000. Duncan Smith explained that the figures have changed to ensure the system doesn’t buckle under pressure.

“The earlier plan was we were loading large numbers much earlier on and then the system didn’t cope.

"Following the rest [of the project], we wanted to do it in a different way, which is where we have the system set up, then bring on the larger numbers towards the later stages because you understand how the system will work under that stress,” he said.

“Go slow, test the system, then do the volume.”

Inter-departmental conflict

MPs on the committee told the DWP representatives that they had been made aware of conflicts occurring between the department and the Cabinet Office, after the Government Digital Service (which falls under the Cabinet Office’s responsibility) had been brought in to put Universal Credit back on track.

But Shiplee said: “I can’t comment on tittle tattle, one has disagreements and one has to get on with things.

“I’m talking to the Cabinet Office about helping us to move things forward.”

Shiplee was then asked how sure he was that Universal Credit could be delivered at the scale required for a national rollout, on a scale of one to 10.

“I’ve never been keen on one to 10s, but I believe Universal Credit can be delivered as it has been delivered. I have no doubt in my mind. It has to be,” he said.

Share:

Comments

  • Chris Meggs Wrong answer wrong questionPerhaps the procurement horizon should have included systems or large parts of systems of comparable functionality that have been commissioned by OGDs or by suppliers to themHow many separate registration or registration form-filling applications can you count that have been developed or commissioned by Whitehall facing govt organisations in the last 24 months CLUE you will need more than one hand but probably wont need your feet Answers on a postcard to the usual address
  • DavidChassels Glad to hear that but to build an adaptive means testing application which is all UC is you will need rules calculations state time collaboration flows events escalations all linked to content management and orchestration of required data from any source and all transparent and presented to users as required All now available in one tool so very pleased DWP on to it Buying COTS andor custom coding addressing all these requirements will result in anotherinflexible legacy mess
  • Steve Coding in open source is not the answer This makes no sense for this context They are talking about using open source technology not creating it
  • DavidChassels GDS may have knowledge building web pages but building an end to end service is a whole different game that requires business knowledge of BPM supporting technologies Great quote from this well informed site httpbpmcom If you think that user experience and Business ProcessManagement are two separate things I think you should reconsider - See more at httpbpmcomBlogsbpm-quote DWP totally ignored this technology in their original decision making from a UK company with proven capability to build means testing and all required custom processes without custom coding Coding in open source is not the answer but helps GDS build a new empire and like DWP they ignore This interesting view from the US helps explain httpkellblogcom20131201 Time will tell and so another round of accountability will be exposed
Advertisement
Send to a friend

Email this article to a friend or colleague:


PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.


We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message

ComputerworldUK Knowledge Vault

ComputerworldUK
Share
x
Open
* *