New government body to regulate large IT projects

New government body to regulate large IT projects

Major Projects Authority will attempt to improve project management

Article comments

The government has established a body called the Major Projects Authority, in order to regulate large projects including IT.

The MPA, created by the Treasury and the Cabinet Office, will attempt to ensure projects are delivered on time and on budget. Projects to be assessed include the £350 million troubled IT programme at the Rural Payment Agency.

Projects of over £100 million are the most likely to fall under the remit of the MPA.

Cabinet Office minister Francis Maude said: “Previously, government projects have had a poor delivery record. There was no cross-governmental understanding of the size and cost of the government’s major project portfolio, and projects often began with no agreed budget, no business case and unrealistic delivery timetables.”

“The MPA will work in collaboration with central government departments to help us get firmer control of our major projects both at an individual and portfolio level.”

The MPA will bring together commercial, finance and project management “expertise”, the government said. It will attempt to ensure there is a more “systematic” approach to managing projects.

It will compile a portfolio of major government projects and report publicly on them once a year, agree the plan for assurance and approval requirements at the start of projects, undertake assurance at key stages, work directly with departments to build capability in projects and programme management, and intervene directly in failing projects.
Last year, the government conducted a major projects review, which looked at 204 projects, with 31 subjected to “deep investigation”. Following the review, the £1.2 billion eBorders project with Raytheon and the £350 million FireControl programme with EADS were terminated.



  • Flacksteen The last government did not have a single minister with the least comprehension of how an IT project should be set up and run Many projects were for honour and glory FireControl or to satisfy civil service ambitions the National Identity Register Some smaller projects actually worked as planned but were socially unacceptable ContactPoint Some were incomprehensible the NHS project to make medical records available to users who could also keep their own medical filesFrancis Maude has a better understanding of what is needed but the Treasury and the Cabinet Office need to field some brighter IT talent than they have so far to get a proper grip on this Dont forget by the way that the Charlie running the miserable Identity and Passport Service which was supposed to change our lives with ID cards came from Accenture Perhaps even bright boys lose it once they start working for government
  • Willhay99 If they only applied PRINCE2 Their own project management system principles in full all these failed projects may never have happened
Send to a friend

Email this article to a friend or colleague:

PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.

We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message
* *