‘Major risks’ to £11.3bn smart meter rollout

‘Major risks’ to £11.3bn smart meter rollout

NAO raises concerns over costs and how much energy usage will change

Article comments

The national rollout of smart meters, set to cost £11.3 billion, faces “major risks” on value for money according to a tough report by the National Audit Office.

The report questioned how much energy usage will change, and how clearly the government had set a benefits realisation plan or a strategy for engaging consumers.

The rollout is aimed at helping customers to control their usage by providing detailed real time information on what their consumption is costing. It is also seen as an important step towards smart grids, which will target better management of demand.

Smart electricity and gas meters will be installed in all homes and small businesses, during a five year period from 2014.

But the NAO said today that the Department of Energy and Climate Change “must address” a number of risks to the programme if the rollout is to deliver value for money. The government is targeting £18.6 billion benefit to the economy between 2011 and 2030, including from changed energy usage by consumers and improved processes for suppliers.

Principally there was “uncertainty”, the NAO said, about “the extent to which smart meters will result in changed energy use by consumers over a sustained period”.

The NAO expressed concerns that the department has not yet developed a benefits realisation plan or consumer engagement strategy.

There was also “very little contingency time” to address risks that design approvals, procurement and testing “take longer than planned”, the NAO warned.

It also highlighted questions over whether the system was “flexible enough to minimise the risk of future obsolescence”, as well as a need for much clearer plans for system security.

The department had improved programme management, the NAO noted, after an early phase demonstrated that planning and budgeting were “insufficient to support clear monitoring and accountability”.

Amyas Morse, head of the NAO, said as the report was published: “The benefits of proceeding with this major technological and logistical undertaking are still uncertain. There is limited evidence of how much and for how long British consumers’ behaviour might change, and costs could escalate.”

Morse called for the department to set “clear decision points” at which it will review costs to consumers, benefits and risks “and judge whether to carry on as originally planned or significantly change direction”.



  • Andy Hutt, CEO, triOpsis The reports that the costsof the proposed nationwide smart meter roll-out could escalate are concerningbut that is not the onlyworry Look atthe numbers facing the industry today Almost 30 million meters to replace infive years equates to 20000 new installations a day Too often a meter fittercannot complete a job because of various obstacles whether it be incorrectpipework located at height or in a confined space Industry experience offitting meters indicates that roughly 20 percent of jobs are aborted and insome instances it has taken up to five visits to complete the installationThe installation of a smart meter can take anything from an hour to a day Thismeans anything from 4000 to 28000 man hours could potentially be wasteddaily However all is not lostfor energy organisations as a sophisticated approach using mobile photographycan provide substantial benefits to the installation process A meter readernote not fitter can now quickly photograph an existing meter and have itautomatically uploaded with essential contextual information to a websiteThis instantly brings visual intelligence back to Head Office so they can givethe fitter the information required to ensure he is equipped with the righttools to install the smart meter on the first visit It brings a level ofcontrol that was previously lacking across the industry and has a significantimpact on the level of quality of work Having clear visibility of what toexpect will slash the number of aborted jobs which will in turn be better forthe environment as less travelling back and forth reduces carbon emissionsand will keep the energy industry on course to complete this roll-out on timeand within budgetAndy Hutt CEO triOpsis
Send to a friend

Email this article to a friend or colleague:

PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.

We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message
* *