We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message
Oracle fuels Java controversy with draft OpenJDK bylaws

Oracle fuels Java controversy with draft OpenJDK bylaws

Open-source Java implementation rules do not alieviate concerns

Article comments

Oracle has issued a set of draft bylaws that it hopes will guide the process of developing its preferred open-source version of the Java programming language, the OpenJDK.

The goal of the governance document is to encourage "members to act in an open, transparent, and meritocratic manner," the bylaws state. OpenJDK is the open-source implementation of the Java Platform, Standard Edition.

"This is a starting point, not a done deal. There are numerous bugs and missed corner cases in this draft and, no doubt, even more numerous ways in which it can be improved," wrote Mark Reinhold, chief architect of the Java 7 Platform who served as editor for the document, in a blog post.

Reinhold will accept and consider comments until March 3, after which he will submit it to OpenJDK Community members for ratification.

Some criticism has already been weighed against the work's heavy reliance on Oracle and IBM personnel.

In addition to Reinhold and another Oracle worker, two employees of IBM also helped draft the document, along with Java developer Doug Lea and the Eclipse Foundation Executive Director Mike Milinkovich. Reinhold also borrowed from the work of Sun Microsystems' interim OpenJDK governance board.

In a Twitter post, Forrester analyst Jeffrey Hammond noted that the bylaws favour a "duopoly" that Oracle and IBM are now building over the control of Java, a charge that he detailed in a recently released report.

Mike Gualtieri, another Forrester analyst, echoed a similar sentiment on Twitter as well, accusing Oracle of running a "puppet governing board."

Milinkovich, however, defended the work, noting that the draft "largely succeeded" in setting up an impartial governing structure.


Share:

Comments

Advertisement
Advertisement
Send to a friend

Email this article to a friend or colleague:


PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.


ComputerworldUK Knowledge Vault

ComputerworldUK
Share
x
Open
* *