We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message

Oracle should not sue Google over Java use, readers say

Big thumbs down to court battle

Article comments

Computerworld UK readers have given an emphatic ‘no’ to Oracle’s move to sue Google over its use of Java.

Last week, Oracle alleged that Google had “directly copied” the Java code in its Android mobile phone operating system. Oracle inherited control of Java after buying Sun Microsystems in 2009.

Google denies the allegations.

Nearly two-thirds (63 percent) of readers agreed with a statement, in a poll on the Computerworld UK site, that Oracle would “risk the future” of the hugely popular programming language by making the move.

As of Friday, a fifth said they hoped the issue would be solved. But the same proportion said Oracle had the right to protect its intellectual property by suing Google.

The lawsuit between Oracle and Google over Java copyrights already exists, but Oracle last week updated the details to include the allegation that parts of the Android mobile phone software directly copied Java code.

In the complaint, Oracle said "approximately one-third of Android's Application Programmer Interface (API) packages" are "derivative of Oracle's copyrighted Java API packages”.

"The infringed elements of Oracle America’s copyrighted work include Java method and class names, definitions, organisation, and parameters; the structure, organisation and content of Java class libraries; and the content and organisation of Java’s documentation," Oracle said.

"In at least several instances, Android computer program code also was directly copied from copyrighted Oracle America code.”

Oracle is also accusing Google of infringing several Java-related patents. Those charges appear unchanged from its original lawsuit.

Google has in the past called the charges "baseless".

Share:

Comments

  • Eduardt Good point However the memory requirement for Java 6 on Linux is 64 MB Was it really necessary to break compatibility
  • meh Except original java would be not really useable on 1Ghz ARM processors with 256MB RAM dude
  • Eduardt Clearly it is Google who is harms Java By failing to make Dalvik Androids virtual machine compliant with the Java standard Google detracts substantially from Javas main advantage Write once run anywhere In that respect it is not better than Microsoft
Advertisement
Send to a friend

Email this article to a friend or colleague:


PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.


ComputerworldUK Knowledge Vault

ComputerworldUK
Share
x
Open
* *