We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message
Algorithmic stock trading rapidly replacing humans, warns government paper

Algorithmic stock trading rapidly replacing humans, warns government paper

Regulatory framework needs to be updated to keep pace with effects of technology

Article comments

Algorithmic trading, including high frequency trading (HFT), is rapidly replacing human decision making, according to a government panel which warned that the right regulations need to be introduced to protect stock markets.

Around one third of share trading in the UK is conducted by computers fulfilling commands based on complex algorithms, said the Foresight panel in a working paper published yesterday.

Nevertheless, this proportion is significantly lower than in the US, where three-quarters of equity dealing is computer generated.

The Foresight panel, led by Dame Clara Furse, the former chief executive of the London Stock Exchange, argued that there are both benefits and severe risks to algorithmic trading.

There was "no direct evidence" that the computer trading in itself increased volatility, it said, but in specific circumstances it was possible for a series of events with "undesired interactions and outcomes" to occur and cause massive damage.

One such event is self-reinforcing feedback loops, whereby small changes, perhaps driven by data delays or news events, loop back on themselves and trigger a bigger change, which again loops back. Another event, normalisation of deviance, is more psychological: unexpected and risky events come to be seen as ever more normal until a stock market crash occurs.

Algorithmic traders’ regular dependency on limited capital while using ultra low networking latency systems presented risks to liquidity, and with the better predictability of order flows there were also risks of market manipulation.

On the positive side of electronic trading, the panel said, liquidity has improved, transaction costs are lower, and market efficiency is generally better.

The paper also stated that technological advances in extracting news will generate more demand for high frequency trading, but higher levels of participation will limit profitability.

Additionally, it said, the systems are becoming increasingly "intelligent", negating the need for human development. "Future trading robots will be able to adapt and learn with little human involvement in their design," the report stated. "Far fewer human traders will be needed in the major financial markets of the future."

Professor Sir John Beddington, chief scientific adviser to the government, writes in the paper’s introduction: "Whilst the prevalence of computer based trading is not disputed, there are diverse views on the risks and benefits which it brings today, and how these could develop in the future.

"Gaining a better understanding of these issues is critical as they affect the health of the financial services sector and the wider economies this serves. The increasingly rapid changes in financial markets mean that foresight is vital if a resilient regulatory framework is to be put in place."

Now read: UK government bank recommendations 'ignore' importance of data in preventing a crash

Share:

Comments

  • JoeT httpwwwbisgovukassetsb
  • Aden Davies Any links to the Government Paper
  • Leo King Joe and Tom you are absolutely correct Thanks for pointing that out - I have amended the story - Leo
  • Useful Inparts this maybe useful - httpbitlymRgh8K - a blog post summarising how computer trading on 6510 almost led to a big problem
  • GonzoG The problem becomes Only the very large trading houses can afford to write and maintain the software for this type of trading Admittedly stock trading is a gamble but in essence artificially intelligent traders can swipe the chips from the smaller investors in microseconds and move on to the next table
  • Tim Hawkins Im more concerned about HFT trading in futures that has potential to wreck energy and food supply with wildly varying prices for basic food items and oil prices
  • Tom Gallagher I was about to post the same thing Cant believe they got it wrong in the first sentence The writer should have a better grasp of what he is calling on to ban
  • bsphil I hope the government movers and shakers in the UK are more technologically inclined than most here in the US Sending too many emails is the equivalent of hacking someones inbox according to some judges here Our politicians are frankly too old and too uneducated in the field for the most partWhat would happen with an asynchronous implementation of stock trading regulations globally which would be nigh impossible to implement anyway How quickly could the companies that utilize HFT jump ship to exploit a different marketplace Maybe my worries are unfoundedBesides on a larger scale Im more wistful for the original purpose of the market to invest in companies products and ideas When will that get completely lost in the race to optimize algorithms for HFTAnd Im an Info Sci major maybe Ill wind up contributing to the problem myself someday
  • JoeT Algorithmic trading also known as high frequency tradingAlgorithmictrading isnt also known as high frequency trading High frequency trading is a specific form of algorithmic trading
Advertisement
Advertisement
Send to a friend

Email this article to a friend or colleague:


PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.


ComputerworldUK Knowledge Vault

ComputerworldUK
Share
x
Open
* *