We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message
Samsung Galaxy Tab too insecure for business use, analysis finds

Samsung Galaxy Tab too insecure for business use, analysis finds

Apple's iPad and RIM PlayBook score higher

Article comments

Samsung’s much-vaunted Galaxy Tab has serious security failings that make it completely unsuitable for use by businesses, a technical analysis by consultancy Context Information Security has found.

In A Hard Pill to Swallow?, Context’s engineers compared the security features of Samsung’s popular Android 3.2-based Tab 7.0 tablet to the iPad 2 and RIM’s BlackBerry PlayBook.

None of the three passed without caveats, but the Tab’s failings put it a far-distant third place in the security stakes.

The Tab’s problems ranged from the inconvenient – it lacked a depth of management tools beyond Exchange ActiveSync for instance – to its lax implementation of encryption.

The researchers found that this wasn’t turned on by default, and even when turned on could only secure a small data partition using 128-bit AES. The SD card had to be encrypted separately.

Although the default could be over-ridden by ActiveSync, that wouldn’t apply to the SD Card which also did not encrypt filenames. The actual encryption design also lacked rigour and could be open to attack in some circumstances.

The iPad and PlayBook did far better in terms of data security, although the team also found that the iPad’s security depended heavily on the length and complexity of the chosen key. Pick one with 8 alphanumeric characters and a dictionary attack would take as long as 9,661 years; reduce that same key to only four letters (a common habit among many iPad users it was suggested) and the time plummeted to 18 minutes.

Another vulnerability of the Tab was its unlocked recovery and native bootloaders, which could allow an attacker to gain access to the ActiveSync credentials. Not all of this is Samsung’s fault of course - Android’s app signing design can allow rogue apps to install themselves more easily than would be the case on a BlackBerry and iPad, which limit this privilege to themselves.

In common with some other Samsung devices, the remote wipe feature was also found to be open to hijacking by any app, allowing such invaders to “wipe the device at will,” although after reporting the issue Samsung reportedly fixed this flaw.

“There was a significant difference in security levels between the Galaxy tablet and the iPad and PlayBook, which were much more closely matched for enterprise levels of security,” concluded Context.

“The Galaxy Tab was shown to suffer from some serious security failings that make it difficult to recommend as a tool for enterprise use,” the company said.

Thanks to RIM’s experience in the business market, the easiest to manage as a BYOD device turned out to be the PlayBook which is ironic because it’s probably the one of the three least likely to be bought by the very BYOD-business users it was supposed to be aimed at.

The iPad is easily the best compromise despite betraying its consumer heritage at times.

The Samsung, meanwhile, needs a lot of work to make it as a serious business device although in fairness Samsung might point oiut that it was not created to serve such a purpose. The question raised by BYOD is whether a simple separation of consumer (=low security) and business (=hight security) is any longer meaningful.

Share:

Comments

  • Letzteantwort Looks like another biased article to advertise Apple They are probably on Apples payroll or getting some incentives Apple relies heavily on media coverage and they help to get better reviews The title is misleading and since lots of people dont read the whole article all they see is how bad the Samsung tablet is Nevermind that they do not inspect the latest device Its like saying that Ford doesnt meet modern safetry standards Oh by the way it was a Ford Pinto from 1971
  • thanks for playing Excuse me while I try to comprehend what just happened here a Galaxy Tab 70 which runs Android 23 not 32 was compared to a Playbook and an iPad 2 and lost How about these kids compared properly with a Galaxy Tab 101 which was released the same year as the iPad 2 Playbook and doesnt run a version of android that is 2 generations out of date
Advertisement
Send to a friend

Email this article to a friend or colleague:


PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.


ComputerworldUK Knowledge Vault

ComputerworldUK
Share
x
Open
* *