We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message
Generic top-level domain programme 'needs more trademark protection'

Generic top-level domain programme 'needs more trademark protection'

Trade group SIAA calls on ICANN to make changes to the programme as problems show up in applications

Article comments

As the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers moves forward, despite ongoing concerns, with its decision to launch a programme to sell new generic top-level domains, the organisation should take new steps to protect trademarks and other intellectual property, a US software trade group said yesterday.

ICANN should react to problems it sees developing as applications come in for new gTLDs, said the Software and Information Industry Association (SIIA), a trade group that has questioned the need for a new gTLD programme.

ICANN needs to make "an adjustment" if it sees trademark and other problems during the three-month application period for new gTLDs, said Scott Bain, SIAA's chief litigation counsel. "Once you see specific applications coming in, you're going to have a specific idea of where the problem areas are, and where the potential abuse might be."

ICANN launched the new gTLD programme late on January 11, even with several groups saying the organisation has not done enough to protect trademarks in what could be an addition of several hundred new TLDs. The new programme will allow new TLDs such as .hotel or .bank, as well as gTLDs in non-Latin characters, in addition to the current 18 gTLDs, such as .com and .info.

Trademark owners have worried that they will have to defensively register hundreds or thousands of new domain names using their trademarks, with potentially hundreds of new gTLDs coming online. "Ideally, this shouldn't have gone forward in the first place," Bain said, adding that now that the gTLD programme is in place, ICANN can make adjustments that help ease concerns.

After the gTLD application deadline in mid-April, ICANN will publish the list of applications and open a 60-day comment period. That public comment period needs to be "meaningful," with ICANN open to making changes to the gTLD programme based on comments, Bain said. In some past ICANN programmes, comment periods ended "shortly before deadlines for action by ICANN," he said.

In addition, SIIA called on ICANN to look for new ways to protect copyright owners when they see subdomains - for example, www.mp3s.music or www.cheap.software - used to infringe intellectual property.

"We're going to want some mechanisms in place to ensure it's not abused," Bain said. "When you have a gTLD that is obviously directed at a particular industry or category, there should be some assurance that it's going to be used only for licensed or authorised purposes."

ICANN also needs to ramp up its staffing to investigate and respond to complaints of trademark and other abuse in the new TLDs, Bain said. The organisation has a small staff that now investigates problems with TLDs, and the problems are likely to grow significantly with the introduction of hundreds of new TLDs, he said.

An ICANN spokesman didn't immediately respond to a request for comments on the SIIA recommendations, but ICANN officials in recent days have said the organisation has put several trademark protections in place, including a global clearinghouse that allows trademark owners to alert ICANN and domain applicants of their intellectual property. For the first time, ICANN has also reserved the right to take back TLDs from owners who aren't operating the domains in the public interest, ICANN officials have said.

Share:

Comments

Advertisement
Advertisement
Send to a friend

Email this article to a friend or colleague:


PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.


ComputerworldUK Knowledge Vault

ComputerworldUK
Share
x
Open
* *