Government aims to slash IT costs by £3.2bn

Government aims to slash IT costs by £3.2bn

Analysts question whether the figures add up

Article comments

The government will attempt to slash£3.2 billion from its annual IT costs, according to a new strategy document published today.

The new ‘ICT strategy’, to be led by government chief information officer John Suffolk, promises to focus on a “smarter, cheaper and greener” setup, cutting costs from its more than £16 billion current expenditure. The new model will deliver “a secure and resilient ICT infrastructure that will enable faster, better services for the public", he said.

To the alarm of some analysts, the target of improving project delivery is only one of fourteen targets. It was announced to much less fanfare in spite of high profile project failures.

Shared services will form a key part of the strategy, aiming to “remove unnecessary overlaps between departments and avoid costly duplication of technology”. The much-hyped government cloud, or G-Cloud, is another key element, and will aim to enable public sector bodies to select and host IT services from one network. It also aims to be quick and cheap to switch suppliers.

Some £300 million would be saved through reducing of the number of public sector datacentres, the government said. It will move from “hundreds” to 10 to 12, also promising to reduce power and cooling requirements by 75 percent. A new ‘Application Store’ will target £500 million savings annually, as a marketplace for sharing and reusing basic applications.

Instead of each department specifying, building and designing its own desktop computers, they will in the future take part in a common desktop strategy. This would save a further £400 million, the government said. It is also targeting a more common software coding architecture and standards.

Other elements of the strategy include the use of open source software, better data security, professionalising IT-enabled change, supply management and international “alignment”.

But analysts were uncertain on how deliverable the savings were. Jan Duffy, research director with IDC’s Government Insights group, said the document was “fairly safe, not revolutionary”.

The savings depended on proper execution of the strategy, not on the document itself, she said. “Will it save money? I suppose it could. I’m just not persuaded that some elements will definitely provide the promised savings.”


Send to a friend

Email this article to a friend or colleague:

PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.

We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message
* *