Skip to content


March 05, 2008

Why decisions don't stick

Over the years, I've seen lots of policy decisions fail to make it into reality. Yet surprisingly, there seems to be little correlation between the quality of the policy and the likelihood that it will be effectively implemented.

By Paul Glen, founder of GeekLeaders.com


Good ideas seem to be almost as difficult to implement as bad ones. But if the quality of the policy isn't matched by the level of resistance, what is?

Advert

Well, I've noticed there is a moment in every policy implementation that seems critical to success or failure. And that's the moment of the public announcement.

If it's done well, people tend to go along. If not, it's all over before anything begins. Heels dig in and the battle of wills starts. (Of course, if a policy is truly odious, the best announcement won't help. But most decisions are neither magical nor malignant.)

I've also noticed a pattern of how these announcements go wrong. There are four basic types of failures.

1. No one finds out Surprisingly, managers don't always tell the staff about their decisions. This may sound funny, but it's possible for a group of managers to get together, debate an important topic, come to a conclusion and just assume that everyone knows what to do next.

No one outside of the room will ever find out because it was never anyone's responsibility to tell the staff. And the initiative will die of neglect. This is just poor planning.

2. Replay In this version, a decision is made and announced, but then it's debated all over again by the people affected. It is neither accepted nor rejected, but taken as a proposal rather than as a policy.

Here, the announcement fails to offer a compelling narrative to the staff. They may understand the content of the decision, but it isn't persuasive. So the debate that the management team had plays out all over again around the water cooler. And there, the proposal dies, is modified or – occasionally – is accepted.

Jump to page : [ 1 ] [ 2 ]

Follow highlights from ComputerworldUK on Twitter
Sign up for our Daily Newsletter
The UK IT News widget Get it for your site!

« prev article | more it & the business opinion articles | next article »

Advert

close

Email this article to a friend or colleague:




PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.

close
  • This article is now being printed.
close

What are your views on this subject? Use the form below to post a comment on this article up to 1000 characters.


Characters remaining:

close

Click below to add 'Why decisions don't stick - IT and the organisation - ComputerworldUK' to your blog.



If you do not have a ComputerworldUK Account and would like to use this feature, please Register.

If you are a registered, logged-in user, this will post the title and first paragraph of this story to your blog to share with your readers.

What is this?

WHITE PAPERS

  • Legal risks: Employee use of the internet and email
    Exploring the challenges facing IT Mangers today and vital steps to ensure safe internet an email use by employees.
  • Phishing for victims
    This White Paper examines the phenomenon of phishing. It explains the potentially catastrophic threat it presents to all kinds of organisation. Exploding some widespread myths, it lights up the murky waters where phishing first emerged and where it continues to evolve. But it also highlights what your business can do to blunt the threat.
  • Challenges and opportunities of PCI
    The control framework implicit in the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) provides an enterprise structure for improving operational, security, and audit performance.
  • Social CRM comes of age
    Who is this “social customer”? What strategies and tools does the new breed of CRM provide to do something about this?
  • Risk Management: Protect and Maximize Stakeholder Value
    What has held organisations back from a broader adoption of risk management programs?
*