Skip to content


September 19, 2008

EU invites industry comment on next gen broadband

Former monopolies complain EU regulation may hinder rollout

By Paul Meller


The European Commission invited the telecommunications industry to comment on its plans to encourage the creation of high-speed networks, sparking swift criticism from both sides in the debate.

Advert

The aim is to give enough incentive to operators to build new fibre-optic networks to replace existing infrastructure, which is mostly made of copper wire, while ensuring that the network operators don't freeze out rivals that want to compete in offering services across the networks.

The former state telecommunications monopolies complain that the Commission's regulatory approach may hinder the rollout of fibre networks, while the competitors complain that the proposed approach doesn't go far enough to ensure them access to networks being built by the incumbents.

The objective of a common regulatory framework for NGA is "to foster a consistent treatment of operators in the EU and thereby ensure the necessary regulatory predictability to invest," the Commission said in a statement.

"The deployment of new fibre networks will shape the competitive conditions of the future. We need an appropriate framework to give European companies fair access to the new networks. We want national rules that will not only encourage the necessary substantial investment in fibre investment but also strengthen broadband competition," said Neelie Kroes, the competition commissioner.

"For consumers, whether private or business, to benefit from the competitive provision of services over optical fibre, it is vital that the Commission provides the regulatory guidance the market needs," said Viviane Reding, the telecommunications commissioner. The commissioners are jointly promoting the initiative.

The Commission's draft set of principles suggest definitions for harmonized categories of regulated high-speed services across the EU. It proposes the sorts of access conditions the owner of a high-speed network can impose on rival operators, rates of return and appropriate risk premiums network owners can charge.

lsa Godlovitch, regulatory affairs director of ECTA, said evidence shows that in the current climate Europe will be hard pressed to support one fibre access line for some customers let alone many.

"We need a very clear signal from the Commission on open access to fibre networks. Otherwise we risk no competition at all or unprofitable investments in duplicate infrastructure that could cripple the sector," she said.

Godlovitch added: "We fear that the Commission's recommendation, in its current form, will not do enough to close the gap between countries which are committed to open access and competition and those which are protecting dominant firms."

The former monopolies mostly took the opposite view. "Considering that Europe is currently lagging behind other regions in fibre deployment and that investment effort is slowing down, the key focus of the recommendation should be on how to boost risky investment by all operators and accelerate network deployment. In its current form it may risks delaying further the NGA deployment to the detriment of consumers," said Michael Bartholomew, director of the association of European Telecoms Network Operators (ETNO), which ranks many of Europe's biggest former public telecommunications monopolies among its members.

British former public monopoly, BT, has distanced itself from most other incumbent operators by claiming to champion open competition. In a statement it said it would submit comments in the consultation that "will reflect our support for competition and customer choice throughout the E.U."

The public consultation closes on 14 November . The Commission will finalize the text after considering the replies it gets, and hopes to formally adopt the regulatory principals next year.

Follow highlights from ComputerworldUK on Twitter
Sign up for our Daily Newsletter
The UK IT News widget Get it for your site!

« prev article | more infrastructure news | next article »

Advert

close

Email this article to a friend or colleague:




PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.

close
  • This article is now being printed.
close

What are your views on this subject? Use the form below to post a comment on this article up to 1000 characters.


Characters remaining:

close

Click below to add 'EU invites industry comment on next gen broadband - Networks - ComputerworldUK' to your blog.



If you do not have a ComputerworldUK Account and would like to use this feature, please Register.

If you are a registered, logged-in user, this will post the title and first paragraph of this story to your blog to share with your readers.

What is this?

Comments received

pup said on Saturday, 20 September 2008

providing new state owned grill or concrete slab covered conduit pits that any party can use to lay new cable of whatever type they want would be a good start.

no need to go through long permit infested ripping up tarmac and digging hole after hole every time you want some drop cable in there, a simple one time community pit and your done.

any private companies that dig must provide and contribute to this global commuity conduit pit any time they digg up somewere that hasnt already been done,they must join any old and new pits within reason.

any private companies dropping highest grade fibre must also drop several lower grade public owned fibre in the same public pit so as to expand that public line, costs comeing out of income you might put in place to finance this.

the key points are MUST standardise on a public conduit PIT and fill it with good quality (not best unless you can finance it) dark fibre that can be used for comunity backhaul with any street wireless kit FI

pup said on Saturday, 20 September 2008

providing new state owned grill or concrete slab covered conduit pits that any party can use to lay new cable of whatever type they want would be a good start.

no need to go through long permit infested ripping up tarmac and digging hole after hole every time you want some drop cable in there, a simple one time community pit and your done.

any private companies that dig must provide and contribute to this global commuity conduit pit any time they digg up somewere that hasnt already been done,they must join any old and new pits within reason.

any private companies dropping highest grade fibre must also drop several lower grade public owned fibre in the same public pit so as to expand that public line, costs comeing out of income you might put in place to finance this.

the key points are MUST standardise on a public conduit PIT and fill it with good quality (not best unless you can finance it) dark fibre that can be used for comunity backhaul with any street wireless kit FI

Advert

WHITE PAPERS

  • Legal risks: Employee use of the internet and email
    Exploring the challenges facing IT Mangers today and vital steps to ensure safe internet an email use by employees.
  • Phishing for victims
    This White Paper examines the phenomenon of phishing. It explains the potentially catastrophic threat it presents to all kinds of organisation. Exploding some widespread myths, it lights up the murky waters where phishing first emerged and where it continues to evolve. But it also highlights what your business can do to blunt the threat.
  • Challenges and opportunities of PCI
    The control framework implicit in the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) provides an enterprise structure for improving operational, security, and audit performance.
  • Social CRM comes of age
    Who is this “social customer”? What strategies and tools does the new breed of CRM provide to do something about this?
  • Risk Management: Protect and Maximize Stakeholder Value
    What has held organisations back from a broader adoption of risk management programs?
*