Skip to content


June 25, 2007

Questions raised over ID cards as Gordon Brown moves in

ID and Passports chief says procurement delayed

By Jeremy Kirk and Tash Shifrin





The government has delayed procurement for its controversial £5.3bn ID card scheme as Gordon Brown prepares to take over as prime minister.

Advert

James Hall, chief executive of the Identity and Passport Service, said a "major" procurement process for IT systems to support the scheme was set to begin, but "we're not quite ready yet".

Hall, speaking at Gartner’s identity management conference in London, did not say when procurement would start.

The delay could signal a rethink as the long-anticipated transfer of power from prime minister Tony Blair to his chancellor, Gordon Brown, finally takes place. Brown’s arrival in Number 10 is expected to produce shifts on some of the more contentious areas of government policy.

A senior source in the supplier community said he had been expecting the procurement notice to be published by the end of the month. But he said the handover to Brown was the probable reason for a delay. "If there is a delay, I'd imagine it's only because of teh current political circumstances," he said.

The government is under increased pressure over the scheme, with the Office of Government Commerce set to make a high court appeal to prevent the “gateway reviews” of the scheme so far from being made public.

Conservative leaders have also cast doubt on the programme’s longer term future, pledging to axe ID cards should the party be returned to power at the next election. In an unprecedented move, shadow home secretary David Davis wrote to potential contractors, warning that they “may wish to consider carefully the financial viability of any contract, with the present Government, to participate in this project”.

Last week, home office minister Liam Byrne spoke up for the ID card scheme and its accompanying national identity register, saying this would in time become part of the critical national infrastructure.

But Byrne implicitly acknowledged public and political controversy over the ID register, saying parliamentary scrutiny of the ID scheme should be beefed up. He announced the creation of a national identity scheme commissioner to oversee the scheme’s operation and the integrity of information recorded in the register.

The government has already stepped back from its original plans. A strategic action plan published in December outlined a slimmed down project, abandoning moves to create a dedicated database for the national identity register in favour of using existing government databases.

But question marks continue to be raised about the scheme, with the government admitting last month that the projected 10-year costs of the scheme had risen by £400m since October.

Estimates by IT capacity and performance consultancy Capacitas, published in February, suggested the scheme’s costs could eventually match those of the £12.4bn NHS National Programme for IT.

Now read

Minister pledges ID register watchdog

Updated: government launches high court appeal against ID card disclosure

ID card scheme costs rise by £400m

Tribunal orders government to publish gateway reviews of ID cards scheme

ID card scheme “at risk” and facing cost hike

IT suppliers' fury over Tory ID contract 'threat'

Tories warn suppliers against taking ID card work

Follow highlights from ComputerworldUK on Twitter
Sign up for our Daily Newsletter
The UK IT News widget Get it for your site!

« prev article | more government & law news | next article »

Advert

close

Email this article to a friend or colleague:




PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.

close
  • This article is now being printed.
close

What are your views on this subject? Use the form below to post a comment on this article up to 1000 characters.


Characters remaining:

close

Click below to add 'Questions raised over ID cards as Gordon Brown moves in - Public sector organisations - ComputerworldUK' to your blog.



If you do not have a ComputerworldUK Account and would like to use this feature, please Register.

If you are a registered, logged-in user, this will post the title and first paragraph of this story to your blog to share with your readers.

What is this?

Comments received

Tom said on Monday, 25 June 2007

These details show that these biometric cards will make bad problems worse and should not be implemented at any cost.

Biometric ID documents (cards and passports) will work fine for organisations where everyone concerned is on the database and every point of transaction has equipment to read these documents.



Nationally it is virtually impossible to satisfy both these conditions and hence it is obvious that these documents will fail. In reality they will tempt fraudsters to use fakes of these documents as IDs where there is no reading equipment and hence make bad problems worse by boosting identity fraud.

Advert

WHITE PAPERS

  • Legal risks: Employee use of the internet and email
    Exploring the challenges facing IT Mangers today and vital steps to ensure safe internet an email use by employees.
  • Phishing for victims
    This White Paper examines the phenomenon of phishing. It explains the potentially catastrophic threat it presents to all kinds of organisation. Exploding some widespread myths, it lights up the murky waters where phishing first emerged and where it continues to evolve. But it also highlights what your business can do to blunt the threat.
  • Challenges and opportunities of PCI
    The control framework implicit in the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) provides an enterprise structure for improving operational, security, and audit performance.
  • Social CRM comes of age
    Who is this “social customer”? What strategies and tools does the new breed of CRM provide to do something about this?
  • Risk Management: Protect and Maximize Stakeholder Value
    What has held organisations back from a broader adoption of risk management programs?
*