Skip to content


February 23, 2009

ID cards Gateway Reviews must be published

Campaigners in historic legal win against government

By Leo King, Computerworld UK


The government has been ordered to publish key Gateway Reviews into the identity cards scheme, after a four year battle to keep the reports under wraps.

Advert

In an historic victory for campaigners backed by the Information Commissioner, the Information Tribunal has ordered the government to publish the reports’ findings within 28 days.

The forced disclosure of the findings is an embarrassing turn of events for the government, which has for four years sought to suppress the results of the reports, which were published in 2003 and examined the technological merits of the £4.7 billion scheme. The government had argued that the findings needed to be kept confidential in order to protect future reviews.

The news comes a week after unions representing airline pilots, the first British nationals to receive the cards, reiterated that pilots did not want to be “guinea pigs” for the controversial project.

In its judgement, the Information Tribunal states that it “upholds the decision of the information commissioner ... and orders the disclosure of the two Gateway Reports” within 28 days. There was “an undoubted debate as to the merits of the scheme”, it said.

In a damning condemnation of the government’s handling of large IT schemes, the tribunal said: “Of particular importance is the fact openly recognised by many witnesses that there ... remains a perception that central government does not have a particularly good track record with regard to IT projects.”

The public deserved to know if the ID cards scheme was “properly scrutinised and implemented”, it said.

The government's Office of Government Commerce, which runs the Gateway Review scheme, said the ruling did not set a precedent for reviews of other projects.
Now read:

Government’s citizen databases risk ‘undermining’ democracy

Follow highlights from ComputerworldUK on Twitter
Sign up for our Daily Newsletter
The UK IT News widget Get it for your site!

« prev article | more government & law news | next article »

Advert

close

Email this article to a friend or colleague:




PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.

close
  • This article is now being printed.
close

What are your views on this subject? Use the form below to post a comment on this article up to 1000 characters.


Characters remaining:

close

Click below to add 'ID cards Gateway Reviews must be published - Legislation/regulation/privacy - ComputerworldUK' to your blog.



If you do not have a ComputerworldUK Account and would like to use this feature, please Register.

If you are a registered, logged-in user, this will post the title and first paragraph of this story to your blog to share with your readers.

What is this?

Advert

WHITE PAPERS

  • Legal risks: Employee use of the internet and email
    Exploring the challenges facing IT Mangers today and vital steps to ensure safe internet an email use by employees.
  • Phishing for victims
    This White Paper examines the phenomenon of phishing. It explains the potentially catastrophic threat it presents to all kinds of organisation. Exploding some widespread myths, it lights up the murky waters where phishing first emerged and where it continues to evolve. But it also highlights what your business can do to blunt the threat.
  • Challenges and opportunities of PCI
    The control framework implicit in the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) provides an enterprise structure for improving operational, security, and audit performance.
  • Social CRM comes of age
    Who is this “social customer”? What strategies and tools does the new breed of CRM provide to do something about this?
  • Risk Management: Protect and Maximize Stakeholder Value
    What has held organisations back from a broader adoption of risk management programs?
*