Management
Technology
- Applications
- Business Intelligence
- Development
- Hardware
- Mobile & Wireless
- Networking
- Internet
- Operating Systems
- Security Products
- Servers & Datacentre
- Storage
Toolbox
Training
Books
White Papers
Webcast
Resource Centre
March 19, 2008
More software could get UK patents
Court case raises hopes, but subject to appeal
By Jeremy Kirk IDG News Service
An appeals court decision in London is causing confusion over long-standing European regulations that have generally meant computer programs can't be patented.
Advert
The case could eventually mean that software companies applying for a UK patent have a better chance of receiving one, although the decision is to be appealed.
In July 2007 the Intellectual Property Office (IPO) rejected a patent filed by Symbian for a system that makes accessing dynamic link libraries – or files used by more than one application – more reliable.
The IPO said Symbian's innovation was computer code and therefore not patentable. The Court of Appeals, however, overturned the decision this week and said the system is patentable.
The IPO is now lodging another appeal, although not on the grounds of whether Symbian should get the patent.
The IPO is concerned that the latest appeals courts decision takes a different interpretation of case law over how to decide if an innovation merits a patent, said deputy director Andy Bartlett. "From our point of view, we are interested in some clarity in how we should be interpreting the law," he said.
Legal precedent does allow for a patent to be granted for computer code in one instance: if the computer code makes a "technical" contribution, Bartlett said.
For example, code that coordinates how a car's brakes function would be patentable. However, an improved version of a word processing program would not qualify, he said.
A four-part test established in a previous patent case is generally used as a guide to whether the particular code can be excluded from the ban on patents for computer programs, Bartlett said. The test was intended to resolve fuzziness around what constituted a technical contribution.
In the latest case, the judge used the test, but not in the way it had been applied before, the IPO contends. The judge also determined that Symbian's innovation improved the reliability of a computer, constituting a technical contribution that qualified the idea for a patent.
Further complicating the case is the fact that the European Patent Office (EPO), an organisation that let companies apply for patents that are valid in 38 European countries, awarded Symbian the patent.
Both the EPO and the IPO are bound by the European Patent Convention of 1973. Usually, both entities arrive at the same conclusion, although they use different methodologies when evaluating patent applications, Bartlett said.
This time, however, "there's a bit of conflict, and that's not great," Bartlett said.
In the US, computer programs are regularly patented.
Follow highlights from ComputerworldUK on Twitter
Sign up for our Daily Newsletter
The UK IT News widget Get it for your site!
« prev article | more government & law news | next article »
Advert
Email this article to a friend or colleague:
PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.
- This article is now being printed.
What are your views on this subject? Use the form below to post a comment on this article up to 1000 characters.
Click below to add 'More software could get UK patents - Legislation/regulation/privacy - ComputerworldUK' to your blog.
If you do not have a ComputerworldUK Account and would like to use this feature, please Register.
If you are a registered, logged-in user, this will post the title and first paragraph of this story to your blog to share with your readers.
Advert












































Comments received
Jock said on Thursday, 20 March 2008
Patent law hasn't kept up with the development of software as a major financial force in industry. The troubles we're seeing over so called "intellectual property" are being wrought by greedy patent lawyer and litigators who view attacking competitors in the courts as a legitimate business process. Patent law needs must be rewritten to demonstrate precisely why software and business processes are not covered, or we'll keep seeing it being interpreted on the whim of ignorant judges with no experience