How Microsoft can beat the iPhone with Windows Phone 7

How Microsoft can beat the iPhone with Windows Phone 7

To drive sales, Microsoft has to keep prices low

Our colleagues over at IDC caused some chuckles to break out across the tech world when they predicted that Microsoft's Windows phones will beat the iPhone in market share by 2015. Impossible! Absurd! seemed to be the default responses.

But is it really so far-fetched? Gartner, the other giant tech analyst firm, now agrees with IDC in a new report that says Windows phones will take 19.5% market share by 2015, compared to 17.2% for Apple's iOS.


While it's tough to predict outcomes in such a volatile market four years in advance, there are plausible scenarios under which Microsoft can topple Apple in market share. To do so, Microsoft must position Windows Phone 7 as a low end smartphone, almost like a high end "dumb" phone, while Apple continues going after the highest, most expensive end of the mobile market.

Microsoft and its partners are, in effect, already doing this. Search Amazon and you can find Windows phones such as the Samsung Focus, LG Quantum and HTC Surround for just one cent from US carrier AT&T.

If your phone can check email, surf the web, and play music and videos it already does most of what a typical iPhone owner uses the device for. And if it's free, rather than costing hundreds, many people will take it.

One thing to remember is the smartphone market is not yet the biggest piece of the cell phone world. As Network World's Julie Bort recently reported, 65% of mobile phone buyers plan to buy another "dumb" phone.

I moved up from a dumb phone to an Android last year after weighing the price against the benefits. Including taxes, I was already paying $50 a month for a basic voice plan with limited texting. I could get a free phone and pay another $10 a month for email, which I wanted. But an unlimited data plan from Verizon was $30 a month, so in effect I would pay just another $20 a month, raising my monthly fee by 33%, for the opportunity to upgrade from a phone that did almost nothing to a phone that does everything.

Once I decided the extra $20 a month was worth it, I had to pony up some cash upfront for a Motorola Droid. Networks also charge for iPhones. Both of these prices are less than what $20 a month costs over the two years of a contract, but since it's an upfront charge the price of the phone is still a barrier for those who haven't made the move from a dumb phone to a smartphone.

But what if all these dumb phone buyers suddenly can get a smartphone for free? That extra monthly fee doesn't look so bad all of a sudden. And if a large portion of regular phone owners upgrade to smartphones between now and 2015 there's no reason to think many of them won't choose a cheap Windows phone as long the iPhone continues to cost so much.

To be sure, Microsoft and its partners will still sell some high end phones, but it won't be the minimum price.

Android will continue to soar, with Gartner predicting that Google's mobile OS will take nearly 50% market share by 2015, leaving Windows Phones and iPhones battling it out for second place.

If Microsoft beats the iPhone in raw market share, the outcome would be similar to the current state of the desktop market. The market share of Windows is gigantic compared to Mac OS X. Yet Windows computers are often cheap, and Microsoft has to split the money with hardware partners, driving down its profit margins. Apple, meanwhile, prices Macs at the high end and builds both the hardware and software itself, which is one big reason Apple has higher revenue than Microsoft despite selling fewer computers.

After weighing the costs and benefits, Apple may find that it makes financial sense to sell fewer phones than Microsoft does and pocket a higher margin per device. Gartner says as much with its assumption that "Apple will be interested in maintaining margins rather than pursuing market share by changing its pricing strategy."

The other factor working in Microsoft's favor, of course, is the Nokia deal. Because of its dominant position outside the United States, Nokia still sells more smartphones than Apple. Today, those phones are Symbian-based, but they will be transitioned to Windows Phone 7 as fast as Microsoft and Nokia can make it happen.

There have been some reports that Apple will develop a cheaper, smaller version of the iPhone to go after the low end of the market, but that still remains to be seen. 2015 is a long way away in the mobile market, but the combination of Nokia's existing market share and a Microsoft strategy to target the low end of the smartphone market could well be enough to drive Microsoft sales ahead of the iPhone.

Comments

  • John Davis Watching Microsoft trying to copy Apple is a bit like watching an Orang Utan with a hammer and nails doing carpentry Its cute and amusing perhaps but if youre expecting something useful to come out of it it isnt going to happen This is probably a bit harsh but there is truth in it Microsoft has Apple-envy very bad The Zune and its imitation iTunes died a silent and lonely death and the much hyped Kin phone passed into obscurity after a few short weeks The MS phone OS is so popular that they had to bribe Nokia ONE BILLION DOLLARS to use it But the real Orang Utan is Ballmer He wants to increase the count of Microsoft stores to be greater than the number of Apple stores He doesnt see that not ONE of the eight existing MS stores makes any money for MSSomeone give him a banana
  • fring 1234567The danger is people will eventually begin to get tired of fashion products like Apple and its iOSin fact the signs are already there that people are getting sick of the hype of Apple being shoved down there throatsI love this stupid is as stupid does argument that would not merit a pass at 101 level because it completely misses the point that virtually everything Apple sells these days is to a former WindowsPC user Apple has long outgrown the fanbase that kept them going before the new millenium The new Apple users see that Apple actually delivers on its promises doing exactly what it says on the tin The satisfaction rates are off the scale in areas unexplored by the users of competing products Buyers know clearly what they are getting Anti-Apple folks buy promises suffer buyers remorse but would still rather bash Apple for their own failings than recognise the shortcomings of their decisions Keep it up guys your short sighted contrariness makes Apple just look better and its users warmer
  • 1234567 The danger with Apple is that its become a product fashion statement If Microsoft keep a good profile without hype like with WP7 as they are doing which still is not mainstream accepted as Apples iOS iphones are The danger is people will eventually begin to get tired of fashion products like Apple and its iOSin fact the signs are already there that people are getting sick of the hype of Apple being shoved down there throats and people will rebel and look for something new and fresh That will be WP7 and I believe it will eventually be as popular as Apples iOS
  • wired-4058 At the end of the day it is the revenue that is important not market share
  • Mile L. It will be a long time before Android can catch up to iOS People need to remember the iOS is growing over 3 times faster and already has 238 million units in service Android 74 million And now that Google seems to be giving up on the Android OS it doesnt look good-Maybe they will pull through but both developers and customers hate the Android OS so we are probably looking at another Zune
  • neutrino23 The numbers IDC came out with were very curious even ignoring their precision Im reminded of something a colleague once said which is why do these companies think they have a god given right to keep their existing market share I understand that Nokia has done well outside the US till now but things may change I agree with the basic thrust of your argument A cheapfree phone can undercut the leaders However 2015 is far away and we have no idea how Apple et al will react They certainly will not sit passively by while a new competitor tries to take a large share of the marketNokiaMS have a good chance to get the business of people who dont care what OS is in their phone Is that worth it What sort of customer loyalty will they have How much additional business will they get
  • Donald Michael Kraig As seems to be popular today among the Apple attackers honesty is lacking Jon youre comparing uh apples and orangesMicrosoft does NOT sell phones Well they tried and failed miserably Google does NOT sell phones Well they tried and failed albeit not as miserably as Microsoft MS sells software Google gives away software Comparing what MS and Google with Android does to the iPhone is comparing software to hardware You might as well say that Exxon-Mobile is better than GM because its in more vehicles than GM makesIF you want to compare the iPhone against other individual phones fair enough Compare its sales with any particular phone that uses Microsofts OS or Android However if you want to compare Android and Microsofts OS to Apples offering then you have to compare it with iOS not the iPhone That means the sales of all iPhone the iPod touch and the iPadIts possible that Android might do that in the future After all Google give the OS away allowing distributors such as ATampT and Verizon to give away products that are often well lets call it quality challenged Right now MS is a year away from producing a solid mobile OS and people using the current version are basically beta testers paying for the privilege A good mobile system from MS is currently vaporware MS had to pay a billion dollars A BILLION just to get one company to use their mobile OS Right now MS has NO chance to dominate NoneOf course all of this may change in the future Right now its all guesswork But the way youre going Jon youre guessing wrong
Send to a friend

Email this article to a friend or colleague:


PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.


ComputerworldUK Webcast

ComputerworldUK
Share
x
Open
* *