How Digg managed to dig its own grave

How Digg managed to dig its own grave

Competition and arrogance just some of the reasons why the mighty site tumbled

Once a high-flying web property, Digg was sold Thursday for a paltry $500,000. The sale to Betaworks, maker of an iOS news aggregator app and an URL clipper, Bit.ly, was a fraction of the $45 million lavished on the venture by Silicon Valley money lenders since its founding in 2004.

So why did Digg fall on hard times? Here are seven reasons.


1) Design Arrogance

Digg redesigned its website in August 2010. It was a disaster. Not only was the redesign buggy, but it removed popular features, like "burying" stories. The impact of the design mess was swift. Digg experienced a 24 percent drop in traffic and within months, it was laying off people. At its height in 2008, Digg was attracting 30 million users a month. When it was sold, that had dropped to seven million.

2) Biting the hand that feeds your feeds

Digg had millions of users, but the popularity of news on the site was driven by a couple of hundred "power users." Those users kept the site lively. Instead of encouraging activity by those power users, Digg treated them like lepers.


3) Failure to look in rear view mirror

While Digg was alienating members, a viable alternative emerged to what Digg was offering. That alternative was Reddit, which allowed news hounds to determine news trends on the Web but to take action, too. For example, Reddit was a key forum for protestors that brought down legislation that opponents maintained would undermine freedom in cyberspace.

4) Cannibalisation by competitors

The ideas underlying Digg - including recommending news to otherswere absorbed by rivals like Facebook and Twitter. That erosion of Digg's preeminence in its niche began even before its design disaster. In 2009, for instance, Twitter passed Digg in popularity and never looked back.

5) Show me the money

Like many social websites, Digg had trouble making money. Online advertising couldn't generate the kind of cash it wanted to make and supplemental schemes, like sponsored, in-stream links, just didn't work.


6) Founders fled

The tandem behind the site, Kevin Rose and Jay Adleson, moved on. As they did, so did the site's verve. Rose is now with Google's venture captial fund. Adleson is an adviser at SimpleGeo.


7) Cover Jinx

In sports, there's a superstition about an athlete appearing on the cover of Sports Illustrated. Do it, and something bad is bound to happen to you. While there's no similar hoodoo for business magazine covers, you have to wonder if Rose's flaunting of his success with his "How This Kid Made $60 Million in 18 Months" Businessweek cover may have jinxed Digg.

Comments

  • Mya go New digg looks like pinterest clone and digg was unique They made completely new system I understand that some changes and improvements are necessery but they shouldnt do it that way They shouldnt force people to log in through fb Thats just not fair As for me I want to be more anonymous using sites like digg so I dont think I will use facebook account to log into it Maybe its time to try something new Maybe this one httppingitblogits-a-dog- I dont know yet what to think about this pingit but idea looks more interesting than digg They say that its about surfing interenet together And I have a choice - I can register by email facebook or twitter BTW whats with this article photo
Send to a friend

Email this article to a friend or colleague:


PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.


ComputerworldUK Webcast

ComputerworldUK
Share
x
Open
* *