Hogan Lovells ‘breaks the mould’ with legal sector cloud HR deployment

Hogan Lovells ‘breaks the mould’ with legal sector cloud HR deployment

International law firm chooses Workday over traditional vendors

Article comments

International law firm Hogan Lovells has sought to ‘break the mould’ in the traditionally conservative legal industry by moving its HR system into the cloud with Workday, choosing the software as a service model over traditional HR vendors.

Hogan Lovells formed in 2010 as the result of a merger between US firm Hogan & Hartson and London-based Lovells. The company now operates in 40 locations within 25 separate jurisdictions (there are five offices within the jurisdiction of Germany, for example), spread over the US, Europe, Asia and the Middle East.  With a total of around 6,500 staff worldwide, split between lawyers and back office support, the company has a sizeable disparate workforce.


Hogan Lovells previously had a number of HR solutions across the various jurisdictions it operated in.  These varied in terms the level of sophistication of the solution. In the US the payroll function of a Ceridian payroll system was used for HR, while the UK team continued its use of a Northgate HR system put in place around 2000. Meanwhile, other smaller offices across its operations used Excel spreadsheets to collate HR data. All of the systems lacked an international focus and were unable to scale to meet the needs of the growing business. 

However, as Hogan Lovells has seen its business expand through mergers, the company looked at uniting its HR function in order to give a better view of staff expertise across its entire operation. The company began to look at the usual list of vendors which offer HR solutions that are popular in the legal sector, eventually deciding on Workday's software as a service HR system.

Although Hogan Lovells had little experience of public cloud, other than small instances such as email and spam filtering, Gary Abbott,  senior manager for Global Information Management, said that the company quickly found that there were clear benefits of using SaaS, rather than sticking with the on-premises vendors.

“We didn't have any public cloud implementations of any scale in our organisations previously.  Law firms are historically quite conservative about those sorts of things for very good reasons, mainly because our clients are very conservative. So for us to look at Workday as a true Saas, a multitenant capability, is a departure for us as a business."

Customisation vs configuration

In the procurement process, Abbott found that the traditional vendors of HR system fell short when it came to a true cloud offering.  Furthermore the lack of multitenancy meant a reliance on enabling software customisation rather than configuration.

“Even those vendors that are now talking about cloud openly, our view was that some of the vendors haven’t really embraced true multitenant capabilities, which is what we were looking for. They are still trying to work that out and still have the 'new software delivery every three years' mindset.” 

“One of the key values for us working with Workday is that they get a new release or capability out every four months, and we are in control of whether we want to take that new functionality on or not. That is a very exciting model for us because the old days of monolithic upgrade and the inevitable costs that come with those have ended for us."

Furthermore the lack of multitenancy impacts on the transparency around costs.  While many customers will want to have the option to tailor the software to their own needs, this can mean the total cost of ownership mounting up, Abbott said. This may seem to suit the customer initially, but ultimately it is the vendor who benefits from the increased work needed to implement the software.

“The old mindset of the other vendors is that they were very willing to talk about customisation and us bending the product to our will, because from their perspective that is all consultancy dollars. That is not a model we want to be in, so from our point of view what appealed to us about Workday was the transparency around cost.”

Share:

Comments

Send to a friend

Email this article to a friend or colleague:


PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.


We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message

ComputerworldUK Knowledge Vault

ComputerworldUK
Share
x
Open
* *