Skip to content


Open Source? Labour's Working on It

February 25, 2009

Will the UK government really embrace open source and open standards?

Posted by: Glyn Moody


One of the great things about free software is that it transcends politics. Those on the left love it because it is a collaborative effort, born of altruism; those on the right love it because it is efficient and flexible.

This has led to some interesting jockeying on the political scene, as politicians of all stripes have tried to prove that they were more open than their rivals.

There's no doubt that in the UK the winners so far have been the Conservatives, who have seized on open source as a stick with which to beat the current government's miserable record on large-scale IT projects, most of which have been way over budget at best, and utter failures at worst (with some managing both).

This has understandably put pressure on Labour to come up with a riposte, and yesterday it was unveiled in the form of something called “Open Source, Open Standards and Re–Use: Government Action Plan” (there's a handy version from WriteToReply here, where you can add your comments.

Even though its appearance was in some ways inevitable at some point, it is nonetheless very welcome. The UK has been one of the laggards in terms of adopting open source at the government level. That, in its turn, has acted as a serious brake on uptake in business and – worst of all – in education. The fact that the government has Web pages talking in positive terms about free software is undoubtedly a huge win.

And there is some *surprisingly* positive stuff, like this from the foreword

Open Source has been one of the most significant cultural developments in IT and beyond over the last two decades: it has shown that individuals, working together over the Internet, can create products that rival and sometimes beat those of giant corporations; it has shown how giant corporations themselves, and Governments, can become more innovative, more agile and more cost-effective by building on the fruits of community work; and from its IT base the Open Source movement has given leadership to new thinking about intellectual property rights and the availability of information for re–use by others.

Notice in particular the little kicker at the end, which acknowledges “new thinking about intellectual property rights”: that might seem a throwaway comment, but given the huge countervailing pressures to talk up such “rights”, it's pretty amazing to see to added here, almost gratuitously, broadening out the support from just computing to other cognate areas. Let's hope it's a hint of things to come.

The Background section of the new document contains a few points of note. The first is the apparently simple statement:

The Government last formally reviewed its Open Source policy in 2004. The policy made clear that the Government would consider open source solutions alongside proprietary ones in IT Procurements and that contracts will be awarded on a value for money basis.

Jump to page : [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] [ 4 ] [ 5 ]

Follow highlights from ComputerworldUK on Twitter
Sign up for our Daily Newsletter
The UK IT News widget Get it for your site!

<<newer entry | back to blogs indexolder entry>>

Advert

close

Email this article to a friend or colleague:




PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.

close
  • This article is now being printed.
close

What are your views on this subject? Use the form below to post a comment on this article up to 1000 characters.


Characters remaining:

close

Click below to add 'Open Source? Labour's Working on It' to your blog.



If you do not have a ComputerworldUK Account and would like to use this feature, please Register.

If you are a registered, logged-in user, this will post the title and first paragraph of this story to your blog to share with your readers.

What is this?

Comments received

Tommy James said on Wednesday, 25 February 2009

Policy statements are cheap. Practical action is what we need. The government has been holding back on renegotiating some Microsoft licenses. Is this just a ploy to apply pressure there? We've been doen this road before, if it is.

Glyn Moody said on Wednesday, 25 February 2009

Agreed - see my final comments. The difference here is that we've got a fairly comprehensive action plan: at least we can try to hold them to it.

paul (the unverified) said on Thursday, 26 February 2009

Here's hoping it isn't a negotiation tactic w/MS.

I enjoyed your descriptive re the appeal of OSS to both Conservatives and Labour. So in the US, we have the Democraps and Repugnacans; obviously I've lost faith in both, go figure. And yet, neither one seems to really want to embrace or even comment re OSS. Which leads me to believe that the unseen third party of our political system (ie, Business) has more influence re this matter than either of the other two.

Glyn Moody said on Thursday, 26 February 2009

@pal: I don't think it's a negotating tactic, I think it's a political move...

Sarah said on Friday, 06 March 2009

I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.

Sarah

http://www.craigslistdecoded.info

Sarah said on Monday, 23 March 2009

I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.

Sarah

http://www.lyricsdigs.com

John Suffolk, Government CIO said on Friday, 29 May 2009

thanks for your comments I welcome them. As ever the easy bit is always writing the policy, the hard graft is putting it into practice. The good thing is given that everything that we/I do in Government is avaialble for all to see I have a sneaking view that we might be kept on our toes and held to account by a strong bunch of passionate people on this! However one thing to think about - So far we have launched a common desktop strategy; a common network strategy, the Open Source strategy (which is truly ptofound); the Green IT STrategy; The Data Handling/IA Strategy; we are working on a data centre strategy - put them all togther and you get the potential for a common infrastructure for Government, or "G-cloud". Add to this agreed "champion" components such as Government Gateway and this becomes a very exciting prospect. We have a way to go, but as you can see, there hs been a lot of things happening since we published our Transformational Government Strategy in October 2005.

Advert

WHITE PAPERS

  • Legal risks: Employee use of the internet and email
    Exploring the challenges facing IT Mangers today and vital steps to ensure safe internet an email use by employees.
  • Phishing for victims
    This White Paper examines the phenomenon of phishing. It explains the potentially catastrophic threat it presents to all kinds of organisation. Exploding some widespread myths, it lights up the murky waters where phishing first emerged and where it continues to evolve. But it also highlights what your business can do to blunt the threat.
  • Challenges and opportunities of PCI
    The control framework implicit in the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) provides an enterprise structure for improving operational, security, and audit performance.
  • Social CRM comes of age
    Who is this “social customer”? What strategies and tools does the new breed of CRM provide to do something about this?
  • Risk Management: Protect and Maximize Stakeholder Value
    What has held organisations back from a broader adoption of risk management programs?
*