Management
Technology
- Applications
- Business Intelligence
- Development
- Hardware
- Mobile & Wireless
- Networking
- Internet
- Operating Systems
- Security Products
- Servers & Datacentre
- Storage
Toolbox
Training
Books
White Papers
Webcast
Resource Centre
Sun's Open Source Appliances
November 26, 2008
Posted by: Glyn Moody
When Sun announced at the beginning of this year that it was buying MySQL for the not inconsiderable sum of a billion dollars, the question most people posed to themselves was how Sun was going to recoup its investment.
I was initially worried that Sun might try to push Solaris over GNU/Linux in the LAMP stack, but Sun's CEO, Jonathan Schwartz was adamant that wasn't going to happen.
Now, nearly a year later, we're beginning to see what exactly Sun has in mind:
Like Wikipedia, most of the planet's largest web sites (just look at the top 100) are built atop Sun's MySQL database. Which is why we've just introduced a line of systems platform designed specifically to run MySQL - at up to 3x the performance of whitebox alternatives (after all, it's far easier marketing to audiences that have already chosen Sun). We're now expanding those offerings with our newest Open Storage portfolio, as well - built to run ZFS from 5 to 50x traditional performance.
As many of us suspected, Sun is trying to use the fact that a company is running MySQL to sell them some hardware, too, touting big performance gains:
With Sun Systems for MySQL x86 Performance, you can improve performance by up to 50% regardless of which OS you run—Linux, Windows, Solaris, or OpenSolaris. Backed by the world-class functionality of Sun's MySQL Enterprise, this unique combination of innovative servers and software expertise can help you get more done with fewer resources while more easily managing data.
Based on industry-standard benchmark results, Sun can provide you with a complete open stack solution that costs up to 53x less, and delivers up to 13x better price performance than a proprietary solutions.
I'm slightly sceptical about the speed improvements quoted – is it really possible to optimise hardware *that* much for a particular piece of software, irrespective of the underlying operating system? – but I presume that there must be some substance to it or people would soon call Sun's bluff.
What's also interesting in Schwartz's posting quoted at the top is that Sun is extending the idea to include its Open Storage product, “built to run ZFS from 5 to 50x traditional performance”. I wonder whether we'll see other offerings of hardware optimised for particular open source apps.
Follow highlights from ComputerworldUK on Twitter
Sign up for our Daily Newsletter
The UK IT News widget Get it for your site!
<<newer entry | back to blogs index | older entry>>
Advert
Email this article to a friend or colleague:
PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.
- This article is now being printed.
What are your views on this subject? Use the form below to post a comment on this article up to 1000 characters.
Click below to add 'Sun's Open Source Appliances' to your blog.
If you do not have a ComputerworldUK Account and would like to use this feature, please Register.
If you are a registered, logged-in user, this will post the title and first paragraph of this story to your blog to share with your readers.
Advert












































Comments received
zaine_ridling said on Wednesday, 26 November 2008
I misread this for some reason. I thought that Sun was altering MySQL's 'improved' code and selling it, but then not passing those improvements back to the free version. Which left me even more confused. Once software is GPL'd isn't it always?
Thanks for the clarifying this.
But no, even with 'screamer' systems built and tweaked to run only MySQL as Sun writes, I can imagine a 5-15% performance increase, but not 50%.
Glyn Moody said on Wednesday, 26 November 2008
I think they're still considering some proprietary "add-ons", but the idea caused a lot of unhappiness in the community, and they seem to have backed away somewhat. It will be interesting to see how this appliance approach works out.